The Madrid concert was a landmark event for the artist, whose connection with Spanish audiences had remained dormant for two decades. Fans packed the stadium to witness a setlist that spanned multiple eras of West's career, from early hits to more recent material from his Bully era. The show was part of the 2026 Ye Live Concert Tour, and Madrid served as the only Spanish date on the itinerary. Tickets were in high demand, with many attendees traveling from across Europe to be there.

A Historic Return to Spain

West's return to Spain carried extra weight given his long absence. The last time he played in the country was nearly twenty years ago, long before many of his biggest records had been released. For longtime fans, the Madrid concert was more than just another tour stop; it was a chance to see an artist who has repeatedly reshaped hip-hop, production, fashion, and pop culture. The venue itself, Riyadh Air Metropolitano, provided a spectacular backdrop, and West delivered a performance that drew from his extensive catalog, reminding everyone why he remains one of the most influential figures in music.

The significance of the Madrid date was not lost on the audience. Many fans had purchased tickets months in advance, and some had faced disappointment when shows in their home countries were canceled. The concert became something of a gathering point for European listeners, a celebration of West's enduring appeal despite the controversies and legal battles that have surrounded him in recent years. The energy in the stadium was described as electric, with fans singing along to classic tracks as well as newer material.

Black Coffee and the Fitz Club Afterparty

Among those in attendance were Black Coffee and his son. The South African DJ and producer has long been a respected name in house music, and his presence at the Madrid show highlighted the cross-genre respect between him and West. The two posed for a picture together at the venue, along with fellow South African DJ Shimza. It was a meeting of musical worlds, blending the realms of hip-hop and house.

The night did not end when the concert did. West was later spotted at what appeared to be the official afterparty at Fitz Club in Madrid, where Black Coffee was performing a set. Rather than taking it easy after a high-energy stadium show, West hit the dance floor and stayed in the moment, enjoying the deep grooves and atmospheric beats that Black Coffee is known for. It was a rare and candid moment, showing a side of West that the public doesn't always get to see: relaxed, enjoying the music, and simply being a fan.

For Black Coffee, the night served as another example of his ability to bring people together through music. The Grammy-winning artist has played at some of the world's most exclusive venues and festivals, and his presence at the afterparty added an extra layer of excitement to an already unforgettable evening. Shimza, who is also a well-known figure in South African house music, joined the gathering, making it a true celebration of electronic music influences.

A Tour Marked by Demand and Disruption

The Madrid show was the only date in Spain on the 2026 Ye Live Concert Tour, but it was not the only stop on the itinerary. The tour has generated massive interest across Europe, but it has also faced its share of challenges. Several dates in the United Kingdom, Poland, France, Switzerland, Italy, and the Czech Republic were canceled, leaving fans in those countries disappointed. However, many of those fans made the journey to Madrid instead, turning the concert into a pan-European event.

The cancellations were not entirely unexpected. West's live performances have been subject to last-minute changes and venue issues in the past, and his touring history has been marked by unpredictability. Nevertheless, the Madrid concert proved that his fan base remains devoted and willing to travel long distances to see him perform. The show also demonstrated that West's music continues to resonate with audiences across generations, from those who grew up with The College Dropout to younger fans who discovered him through later albums and collaborations.

The tour itself has been part of West's ongoing effort to reconnect with his audience after a period of personal and professional upheaval. His recent projects, including the Bully era, have been met with strong commercial performance, and West has been vocal about what that success means to him.

Kanye's Bully Era and Personal Reflection

In addition to his live performances, West has been making headlines for his recent comments about the success of his music during the Bully era. During an address to fans at the Urban One Summit event late last month, he took a moment to thank his supporters for their dedication. He specifically noted that the number one records from this period mean more to him than earlier successes like Graduation and Watch the Thrones.

"I just wanted to thank y'all so much for getting behind us on this journey," West said. "These number ones mean even more than the Graduations and the Watch the Thrones and all the number ones before."

His remarks took on a deeply personal tone as he discussed the challenges he has faced. "Because, as you know, like a year into the project, I went into an episode," he continued. "So this right here is a celebration and a victory, a success story of people who deal with mental health crises to be able to come out of it and actually have number one records with all the things that were done, with all the things that were said. And for you guys to be so forgiving and so supportive just means the world to me."

These comments offered a rare glimpse into West's mindset as he navigates the latest chapter of his career. The Bully era has been marked by a series of releases and performances that have reaffirmed his status as a hip-hop heavyweight, even as he continues to face public scrutiny. His willingness to speak openly about mental health was echoed by fans and observers, who praised his candor.

West's history with mental health has been well documented. His public episodes and diagnoses have often been part of the conversation around his behavior, and his latest reflections suggest a sense of gratitude and resilience. The fact that he is celebrating number one records while acknowledging the difficulties he has overcome adds a layer of depth to the Bully era, making it more than just another album cycle.

The Legacy of Kanye West

Since the release of The College Dropout in 2004, West has consistently pushed the boundaries of hip-hop. His production style, characterized by sped-up soul samples and elaborate orchestration, changed the sound of mainstream rap. Over the years, he has released classic albums such as Late Registration, Graduation, My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, and Yeezus, each marking a new creative phase. He has also been a polarizing figure, known for his outspoken statements, fashion ventures, and high-profile relationships.

Despite the controversies, West's influence remains undeniable. Artists across genres cite him as an inspiration, and his work in fashion with Yeezy has reshaped sneaker culture. His ability to reinvent himself time and again has kept him at the forefront of popular culture for more than two decades. The Madrid show and the subsequent afterparty were yet another reminder of his staying power.

The connection between West and Black Coffee also highlights the broader relationship between hip-hop and electronic music. Black Coffee, whose real name is Nkosinathi Innocent Maphumulo, has been a fixture in the house music scene since the early 2000s. His album Subconsciously won a Grammy for Best Dance/Electronic Album in 2022, and he has collaborated with artists like Drake, Usher, and Pharrell Williams. His ability to blend African rhythms with electronic production has made him a global ambassador for the genre.

For fans who were at the Fitz Club afterparty, the sight of West dancing to Black Coffee's music was a testament to the power of musical collaboration and mutual respect. It was also a reminder that even the biggest stars are, at heart, music lovers. West's decision to spend part of his night on the dance floor, rather than retreating to a private suite, was a spontaneous and human moment.

As the 2026 Ye Live Concert Tour continues, the Madrid show will likely be remembered as one of its highlights. For West, it was a chance to prove that he can still command a stadium and connect with an international audience. For fans, it was an opportunity to witness a piece of music history in a city that had waited two decades for his return. And for those lucky enough to be at the afterparty, it was a night when a hip-hop legend and a house music icon shared the same room, and everyone was invited to dance.

Source: Yahoo Entertainment News

The court heard that on June 9, Gardner had been placed into police custody for unrelated matters when officers became concerned about her health. Concerned for her wellbeing, they took her to Furness General Hospital for medical assessment and treatment. While at the hospital, Gardner’s behaviour became increasingly difficult, and at one point she clashed with PC James Kimberley. According to prosecutor Peter Kelly, officers had to physically take hold of Gardner after she became uncooperative. During the ensuing struggle, she lifted her left leg and kicked out at PC Kimberley’s knee.

Mr Kelly described the kick as a “glancing blow,” but it was enough for Gardner to be further arrested and taken back from the hospital to the police station. The court was told that Gardner had been jailed on August 1 after pleading guilty to a number of other unrelated matters. She appeared in court via video link because of her current imprisonment.

The prosecution highlighted that Gardner had a significant history of violent offending, with 22 previous offences for assault against a person. This record was a key factor in the magistrates’ decision to impose a custodial sentence, despite the relatively minor nature of the injury caused to the officer.

In mitigation, solicitor Lisa Phizacklea explained the circumstances surrounding the incident. She told the court that Gardner had not been allowed to sit in the main waiting area of the hospital. Staff members spoke with police after receiving complaints from members of the public who were uncomfortable with Gardner being in the waiting room. Gardner was lying on the floor and just wanted to go to sleep, according to her solicitor. She was not causing any trouble when officers pinned her to the floor, and it was only then that she kicked out.

Magistrates imposed a consecutive four-week jail term, meaning the sentence will be added to the time Gardner is already serving. She was also ordered to pay £85 in court costs and a £154 victim surcharge upon her release. The chair of the magistrates’ bench commented directly to Gardner: “Your record is less than envious.”

Background: Assaults on Emergency Workers

This case highlights the ongoing issue of assaults against emergency workers in the United Kingdom. Police officers, paramedics, and hospital staff increasingly face violence while carrying out their duties. In recent years, the legal system has taken a tougher stance on such offences. The Assaults on Emergency Workers (Offences) Act 2018 was introduced specifically to provide greater protection for emergency workers, including police officers, prison officers, firefighters, and NHS staff. Under this legislation, assaulting an emergency worker is an aggravated offence, meaning it carries a higher maximum penalty than a standard common assault.

Before the 2018 Act, assaulting a police officer was dealt with under the Police Act 1996, which made it an offence to assault a constable in the execution of their duty. However, the maximum penalty was six months’ imprisonment. The 2018 Act doubled this to 12 months, reflecting the seriousness with which such offences are now treated. The legislation was introduced following a campaign by trade unions and charities representing emergency workers, who argued that violence against those who serve the public was escalating and needed stronger deterrents.

Statistics from the National Police Chiefs’ Council have shown that thousands of assaults on police officers are recorded each year. Many of these occur when officers are dealing with vulnerable individuals, often in healthcare settings, where they must balance the needs of the person with their duty to maintain public safety. In this case, the officers were transporting Gardner to hospital for medical treatment when the situation escalated, a scenario that is familiar to many frontline officers.

The Role of Hospitals and Policing

Furness General Hospital, part of the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, serves the Barrow-in-Furness area of Cumbria. It has an emergency department that frequently receives patients who are in police custody. Officers often accompany detainees to hospital for medical assessments, and these visits can be challenging. Patients might be anxious, distressed, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, making them unpredictable. In some cases, as seen with Gardner, a routine health check can quickly turn into a violent incident.

The court heard that Gardner was lying on the hospital floor and wanted to sleep. This kind of behaviour, while perhaps not aggressive in itself, can cause concern among other patients and visitors. Hospital staff have a duty to ensure the safety and comfort of everyone in their care, and they may ask police to intervene if a patient is causing a disturbance. In this instance, members of the public reportedly complained about Gardner’s presence in the waiting area, prompting staff to speak with the officers.

When officers are asked to manage a difficult detainee in a hospital, they must use their judgment about the level of force required. The use of force by police is governed by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 and the common law, which allows officers to use reasonable force to prevent crime, effect a lawful arrest, or protect themselves or others. What is considered reasonable depends on the circumstances, including the perceived threat at the time. In Gardner’s case, officers decided that physically taking hold of her was necessary, and it was during this intervention that she kicked out.

Katie Gardner’s Criminal History

Katie Gardner’s record includes 22 previous offences for assault against a person. This was a key aggravating factor in her sentencing. Magistrates have the power to impose a custodial sentence for a single charge of assault by beating of an emergency worker, but they must carefully consider the seriousness of the offence and the offender’s background. Gardner’s history of violence would have made it difficult for the court to impose anything other than an immediate custodial sentence, given the need to protect the public and the lack of any clear prospect of rehabilitation.

Her solicitor’s mitigation provided some context for her actions, citing her difficult circumstances and her immediate need for sleep while at the hospital. However, the court clearly took the view that her previous offending outweighed these factors. The fact that she was already in custody for other matters also meant that adding a consecutive sentence was a straightforward decision, as she was not being released imminently.

Assaults on police officers not only cause physical harm but also have a lasting impact on the mental health of the victims. Officers who are attacked often report anxiety, fear, and a reluctance to engage with certain situations in the future. The Police Federation, which represents rank-and-file officers in England and Wales, has repeatedly called for tougher sentences and better support for officers who are victims of violence.

Legal and Social Implications

This case serves as a reminder that violence against emergency workers will not be tolerated. The courts have made it clear that such behaviour is serious and can result in imprisonment, even if the injury is minor. The victim surcharge of £154 is an additional penalty designed to fund support services for victims of crime, and the court costs add to the financial consequences of Gardner’s actions.

More broadly, the incident raises questions about how society treats people who are in custody and in need of medical care. Police officers are not medical professionals, but they are often the ones who accompany detainees to hospital. This dual role can create complex situations, as officers must ensure the safety of the public, the detainee, and themselves. In Gardner’s case, the officers’ decision to transport her to hospital was made out of concern for her health, but it ended with another criminal charge and a further prison sentence.

Healthcare staff also face significant risks when dealing with aggressive patients. NHS Protect figures have previously shown that thousands of incidents of violence and aggression are reported across the health service each year. Hospitals often have security teams and protocols to manage such incidents, but when police are present, the responsibility often falls on them to intervene. Collaboration between police and health services is therefore essential to ensure that both patients and staff are protected.

The sentence imposed on Gardner is relatively short at four weeks, but the impact of having a criminal conviction for assaulting an emergency worker can be long-lasting. It is an offence that may be considered as a sign of a propensity for violence, and it can affect future employment, housing, and relationships. For Gardner, who already has a substantial criminal record, it adds to a pattern of behaviour that has likely had a significant impact on her own life as well.

The magistrates’ comment that her record is “less than envious” was a pointed remark about her history of offending. It suggests that the bench saw her as someone who has repeatedly failed to comply with the law, and that this latest offence was not an isolated lapse but part of a broader trend. In the end, the court’s decision to impose a consecutive jail term reflects the seriousness with which it viewed the assault on PC Kimberley, who was simply doing his duty when he was kicked.

Source: The Mail News

The timing adds an extra layer of intrigue. Just one day earlier, Samsung Mobile shared a teaser featuring J-Hope with a caption that seemed to wink at the upcoming Unpacked event. The caption read: "Can’t give away too much, but j-hope is already hyped for what’s unfolding." That phrase, combined with the Instagram Story showing a phone that looks like a next-generation Galaxy Z Fold, has sparked a wave of speculation across social media and tech forums. Samsung has not officially confirmed that the device in J-Hope's Story is the Galaxy Z Fold 8, but the situation certainly feels calculated.

The Instagram Story and Its Timing

J-Hope's Instagram Story was recorded backstage or during a soundcheck, a moment that would normally seem innocent enough. But for fans who have been following Samsung's foldable phone rumors, the details are hard to ignore. The phone he is holding appears to feature a wider cover display than the current Galaxy Z Fold models. It also seems to have a shorter, more square-shaped body when folded, which matches the design shift that many leaks have attributed to the Galaxy Z Fold 8.

The phone in the Story may also be shown in a distinctive Pistachio color, which has been mentioned in leaks as an online exclusive option for the upcoming foldable. The presence of that color, combined with the visible hardware changes, has led many to believe that J-Hope was not just casually using a phone but rather offering a deliberate glimpse at Samsung's next flagship foldable.

Samsung's relationship with BTS has been deeply intertwined with its mobile marketing for years. J-Hope himself has appeared in multiple promotions for Samsung's foldable devices, and his fellow BTS member SUGA has been featured in campaigns for the Galaxy Buds4 Pro lineup. The group's massive global following has made BTS one of Samsung's most powerful ambassador partnerships, especially for major product launches like the Galaxy Z Fold series. Seeing J-Hope involved in the buildup to another Unpacked event is therefore not surprising in itself. What is surprising is the possibility that he might have revealed the device ahead of schedule.

Samsung and BTS: A Long-Standing Partnership

Samsung has spent years cultivating a close relationship with BTS. Since the group's rise to international stardom, Samsung has leveraged their influence to reach younger audiences around the world. BTS members have appeared in commercials, social media campaigns, and exclusive content tied to Samsung's flagship products. This partnership has extended across the Galaxy S series, the Galaxy Buds lineup, and, perhaps most importantly, the company's foldable phones.

The group's involvement in foldable promotions has been particularly prominent. J-Hope has been seen using Galaxy Z Fold devices in various settings, and the brand association has helped Samsung position its premium foldables as lifestyle devices for creative, mobile-first consumers. Given that history, it is entirely plausible that J-Hope would be given early access to the Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is also plausible that Samsung would be comfortable with him sharing a glimpse of the device, especially if the company wanted to generate organic conversation ahead of its official announcement.

The timing of the Instagram Story also matters. Samsung has been building anticipation for Galaxy Unpacked through official teasers, social media posts, and press invitations. In the lead-up to the event, leaks have already revealed a significant amount of information about the Galaxy Z Fold 8. J-Hope's post adds a layer of celebrity validation to those leaks. It makes the rumored design feel more concrete, because a real person, with millions of followers, is shown holding a device that looks exactly like the leaked renders.

What the Leaks Say About the Galaxy Z Fold 8

If the phone in J-Hope's Story is indeed the Galaxy Z Fold 8, it lines up with much of what has been reported over the past several months. Samsung is widely expected to move away from the tall, narrow cover display that has defined earlier Fold models. In place of that design, the company is reportedly adopting a shorter, wider cover display that should make the phone feel far more natural to use when closed. This change would address one of the most common criticisms of Samsung's foldable phones: the awkward external screen.

The leaked renders of the Galaxy Z Fold 8 also suggest slimmer bezels, a thinner chassis, and a refined hinge mechanism. These changes may help reduce the visibility of the display crease, which has been a persistent concern for foldable phone users. The hinge is especially important because it affects both durability and the overall feel of the device. A redesigned hinge could make the phone feel sturdier while also minimizing the unsightly line that appears down the center of the inner display.

Display, Design, and Build

Under the hood, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 is expected to be powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, which should deliver improvements in performance and energy efficiency. The chip is likely to be paired with generous amounts of RAM and storage, continuing Samsung's tradition of making its Fold devices as powerful as its flagship Galaxy S series. The larger inner display is also expected to support enhanced multitasking features, including better app continuity, drag-and-drop functionality, and more flexible split-screen modes.

Samsung is also expected to double down on Galaxy AI features. Recent Samsung devices have placed a heavy emphasis on on-device artificial intelligence, including tools for photo editing, language translation, and intelligent search. The Galaxy Z Fold 8 could take this further by integrating AI more deeply into the foldable experience. For example, AI could help optimize the layout of apps when the phone is opened or closed, and it could enhance the productivity-focused features that are central to the Fold's appeal.

Camera System

The camera system on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 could represent a notable shift in Samsung's approach. According to leaked reports, the Fold 8 will feature a dual rear camera setup rather than the triple or quad arrangements seen on other premium Samsung phones. The main camera is said to be a 50-megapixel primary sensor, paired with a 50-megapixel ultrawide lens. This configuration suggests that Samsung is prioritizing sensor quality over optical versatility.

One surprising detail is the absence of a dedicated telephoto lens. Instead, Samsung could rely on in-sensor cropping to provide 2x zoom. This approach can work well for moderate zoom levels, but it may not deliver the same level of quality as a dedicated periscope or telephoto lens. For users who frequently take photos at high zoom ranges, this could be a downside. However, the 50-megapixel sensors offer high resolution, which gives Samsung more flexibility to crop without losing too much detail at lower zoom levels.

Rumors also point to two 10-megapixel selfie cameras. One would be embedded in a punch-hole cutout on the cover display, while the other would be placed on the inner display, hidden either under the display or in a camera punch-hole. This dual selfie setup has become common in Samsung's foldable lineup, allowing users to take selfies whether the phone is open or closed. The front-facing cameras are expected to support standard selfie features, AI enhancements, and perhaps some new foldable-specific modes that take advantage of the flexible form factor.

Battery and Charging

Battery life is another area where the Galaxy Z Fold 8 could see meaningful improvements. According to leaks, the phone is expected to pack a 4,800mAh battery, which would be a notable increase from the 4,400mAh cell found in the Galaxy Z Fold 7. Combined with the efficiency gains of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the larger battery could deliver significantly better endurance. For a device that is often used for multitasking, media consumption, and creative work, longer battery life is a crucial upgrade.

Samsung has not yet confirmed the charging speeds for the Galaxy Z Fold 8. It is likely to support fast wired and wireless charging, though the exact specifications remain uncertain. The company may also introduce software improvements that optimize battery usage based on how the phone is being used, such as conserving power when the cover display is active or when the device is closed.

Galaxy Unpacked and What's Next

Samsung is expected to unveil the Galaxy Z Fold 8 during Galaxy Unpacked alongside the Galaxy Z Flip 8, a new lineup of Galaxy Watches, and the latest additions to Galaxy AI. The event is likely to be one of the biggest tech showcases of the year, with a focus on Samsung's vision for the future of mobile devices. The Galaxy Z Fold series has been at the center of Samsung's foldable innovation, and the Fold 8 is expected to push that vision even further.

Until Samsung takes the stage at Unpacked, all of this remains based on leaks and informed speculation. J-Hope's Instagram Story is an exciting hint, but it is not an official confirmation. The phone he is holding certainly resembles the leaked renders, and the timing of the post aligns suspiciously well with Samsung's promotional campaign. Whether intentional or not, the post has already generated significant conversation on social media, in tech communities, and among BTS fans who might not normally follow smartphone news.

For Samsung, the reaction to J-Hope's post could be seen as a positive outcome. The brand loves to create buzz before major announcements, and having a globally recognized pop star show off an unreleased device is a powerful promotional move. It also demonstrates the deep integration between Samsung's product launches and the entertainment industry. As media partnerships and celebrity endorsements continue to shape the tech industry, moments like these remind us that even the most tightly controlled product launches can be influenced by a single social media post.

Samsung's Galaxy Unpacked event is just around the corner, and all signs point to a packed presentation. In addition to the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and Galaxy Z Flip 8, Samsung is expected to introduce new Galaxy Watches with advanced health tracking features and expanded Galaxy AI capabilities. The company is also likely to showcase how its foldable devices integrate with the broader Galaxy ecosystem, including Samsung Galaxy Buds, tablets, and the company's smart home offerings. J-Hope's apparent reveal may be the first real look at the Galaxy Z Fold 8, but it will certainly not be the last. Fans and tech enthusiasts alike are eagerly waiting for the official announcement, and the speculation surrounding J-Hope's Instagram Story has only intensified the excitement. Samsung's next foldable is shaping up to be one of the most anticipated devices of the year, and the conversation around it is already in full swing.

Source: MSN News

Key Facts About the Outside Lands 2026 Livestream

The 2026 Outside Lands music festival takes place from Friday, Aug. 7 through Sunday, Aug. 9 at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, California. The official livestream will be available on Amazon Music and Prime Video starting at 6 p.m. ET/3 p.m. PT. You can watch the livestream through a Prime Video subscription, an Amazon Music subscription, or a free trial of Amazon Prime.

For viewers who want to watch without paying upfront, Amazon Prime offers a 30-day free trial for new members. This trial unlocks access to Outside Lands 2026 as well as other Amazon benefits like Prime Video original programming, Prime Music, Prime Reading, Amazon Photos, fast shipping, Whole Foods Market discounts, and early access to shopping events. If you already have Amazon Prime, you can log in to Prime Video and find the Outside Lands livestream directly. If you don't want to commit, the free trial allows you to watch the festival and cancel before the 30-day period ends.

How to Watch Outside Lands 2026 Online for Free

To watch the Outside Lands 2026 livestream, go to Prime Video on Aug. 7 and select the Outside Lands tile. You will need an active Amazon Prime or Prime Video subscription. If you do not have one, you can sign up for the 30-day free trial. After the trial, a standard Amazon Prime membership includes access to Prime Video, Amazon Music's app catalog, and many additional services. Prime Video is available on smart TVs, streaming devices, game consoles, laptops, and mobile devices, so you can watch from virtually anywhere.

One important note: the free trial is available only to first-time subscribers or those who have not used the trial in the past. If you have previously used a Prime trial, you may be charged the full membership fee for the month. Still, the flexibility of an on-demand platform means you can tune in for the performances you care about most or keep the broadcast running all weekend.

Outside Lands 2026 Festival Lineup

This year's Outside Lands bill is packed with genre-crossing artists, ranging from pop, rock, and electronic to hip-hop, indie, and dance.

Friday, Aug. 7

The first day of the livestream will be headlined by Charli XCX, with the broadcast also featuring performances from Turnstile, Labrinth, Glorilla, Geese, Clipse, Wet Leg, and Modest Mouse. Charli XCX is currently one of the most talked-about acts in pop music following the massive success of her album Brat. Her live shows are known for high-energy choreography, strobe-heavy visuals, and a setlist full of club-infused songs and viral singles. Turnstile brings a hardcore-punk edge to the bill, while Wet Leg offers sharp, playful indie rock. Glorilla represents the new wave of Memphis hip-hop, and Clipse's inclusion adds a classic rap element to the day.

Saturday, Aug. 8

The Strokes headline Saturday's livestream. The New York rock band has remained one of the most influential guitar acts of its generation, with hits like "Last Nite," "Reptilia," and "Someday" still playing a big part in their live performances. The broadcast also includes The xx, Djo, Dijon, PinkPantheress, Ethel Cain, Lucy Dacus, Malcolm Todd, Audrey Hobert, Snow Strippers, DJ Trixie Mattel, and Yard Act. The xx bring a moody, minimalist indie-pop sound, and Djo—the project of actor Joe Keery—has won over fans with a mix of psych-rock and synth pop. PinkPantheress's short but infectious songs have made her one of the most distinctive voices in pop-adjacent electronic music, while Ethel Cain's atmospheric storytelling fills a more cinematic lane.

Sunday, Aug. 9

Closing the festival is Australian electronic trio Rüfüs Du Sol. Known for their immersive live sets, hypnotic melodies, and euphoric breakdowns, Rüfüs Du Sol have become a global dance-music staple. Sunday's livestream also includes Baby Keem, Empire of the Sun, Death Cab for Cutie, Disco Lines, Mariah the Scientist, Not for Radio, Jade, and Miss Monique. Baby Keem brings a playful, experimental approach to hip-hop, and Empire of the Sun's theatrical pop spectacular makes for a dazzling festival set. Death Cab for Cutie offer a more introspective alternative-rock sound, giving the final day a broad emotional range.

A Brief History of Outside Lands

Outside Lands debuted in 2008 in Golden Gate Park and has grown into one of the country's premier boutique festivals. The festival has hosted some of the biggest names in contemporary music, including Radiohead, Paul McCartney, Kendrick Lamar, Billie Eilish, and Stevie Wonder. Unlike many mega-festivals, Outside Lands is known for its scenic location among tall trees and rolling meadows, with the fog often rolling over the San Francisco skyline. The event has also earned a reputation for its food and drink offerings, including a dedicated wine avenue and a museum-like art installation called Bill Graham's Weed Land, which offers curated cannabis experiences.

Over the years, the festival has expanded to include comedy programming, culinary collaborations, and late-night local concerts in San Francisco venues. The livestream partnership with Amazon Music and Prime Video is a relatively recent addition, allowing fans across the country to experience the lineup without traveling to California. This approach has made Outside Lands one of the more accessible major festivals in the streaming era.

What to Expect From the Livestream

Though the livestream will not replace the full festival experience, it provides a front-row seat to some of the biggest performances from Golden Gate Park. Amazon Music and Prime Video have been expanding their live-music programming, and Outside Lands is one of the major events on the calendar. The broadcast will typically switch between stages based on the most anticipated performances, and viewers may be able to select individual sets if the platform uses a multi-stream interface. As with many livestreamed festivals, there may be one primary feed that rotates between artists rather than offering all performances simultaneously.

The start time of 6 p.m. ET/3 p.m. PT means west-coast viewers can tune in as the gates open, while east-coast viewers can enjoy the first night of performances during the evening. The schedule is designed to line up with the festival's stage times, so fans can expect each day to run for several hours. Because the event is spread across Friday through Sunday, viewers should check the platform's schedule for the most up-to-date set times.

Why These Headliners Matter in 2026

Charli XCX's rise to arena-headliner status is one of the defining stories of the mid-2020s. Her album Brat was not only a commercial success but also a cultural moment, with its slime-green aesthetic and highly quotable lyrics turning the singer into a global pop icon. Her addition to Outside Lands as a headliner is a reflection of her staying power and her ability to bring together experimental electronic pop with mainstream appeal.

The Strokes have long been regarded as one of the finest live bands of their era, and their festival appearances remain highly sought after. Even after more than two decades, their setlists draw heavily from Is This It, but they also incorporate songs from later albums like The New Abnormal. For fans of the indie-rock revival, a Saturday night headlining slot from The Strokes is a major draw.

Rüfüs Du Sol have become the kind of act that bridges the gap between the dance floor and the festival field. Their albums, including Simulation and Subliminal, are built on warm synth textures and propulsive, melodic grooves. Their live show has earned them a dedicated following that travels between festivals, and their closing set at Outside Lands is expected to be a highlight of the weekend.

How to Make the Most of Your Free Trial

If you plan on using the Amazon Prime 30-day free trial to watch Outside Lands 2026, it may be helpful to know what else you can do with the membership. Prime Video has a large library of original series and movies, including award-winning titles, and Amazon Music offers ad-free listening and curated playlists. Prime Gaming provides monthly games and in-game content for subscribers. You can also take advantage of free two-day shipping on eligible items, access to rotating deals on Amazon, and discounts at Whole Foods Market. After the festival weekend, you still have time to decide whether to continue the membership or cancel before the trial ends.

Those who already have Amazon Prime can simply open Prime Video on a compatible device. The Outside Lands livestream should appear as a featured event on the homepage. If it does not appear, searching for "Outside Lands 2026" will direct you to the stream. Some users may need to confirm that the device is linked to their Amazon account and that they are in the correct region. While the livestream is intended for a broad audience, occasionally some content can be region-restricted; a VPN may help if you are traveling outside the U.S., but the official broadcast is generally available to Prime members.

The Broader Lineup and Hidden Gems

One of the best parts of Outside Lands is discovering new artists in addition to the heavy hitters. This year's bill includes a strong group of breakout and cult-favorite acts. Geese, a young post-punk band from New York, have earned critical praise for their sprawling, electric live performances. Glorilla, fresh off multiple hit records, brings high-energy rap to the festival. Lucy Dacus, who has built a large following as a solo artist and as a member of boygenius, offers deeply personal songwriting in a festival setting. Empire of the Sun are known for their elaborate stage costumes and shimmering synth-pop anthems. Disco Lines adds a DJ-driven element to the Sunday lineup, and Miss Monique represents a rising wave of progressive-house artists.

There are also moments of pure festival fun on the schedule. DJ Trixie Mattel, a drag-queen DJ set from the RuPaul's Drag Race star, is likely to blend humor with dance music. Snow Strippers combine goth-tinged electronica with punk attitude, making them a perfect late-afternoon act. And Mariah the Scientist's smooth R&B offers a romantic counterpoint to the more guitar-heavy performances of the weekend.

For fans who cannot make the trip to San Francisco, the Outside Lands 2026 livestream is a way to be part of the experience from anywhere. Whether you tune in for a full day or just catch your favorite artist's set, the weekend promises a diverse range of music, memorable live moments, and the unique atmosphere of one of the country's most beautiful festival settings.

Source: Billboard News

Dermer's trip is designed to reassure U.S. officials that Israel remains committed to the bilateral relationship even as the two governments appear to be operating from different scripts on the ceasefire and long-term arrangements in Gaza. The disagreement has already caused friction between Jerusalem and Washington, but senior Israeli officials hope that Dermer's experience and personal relationships can soften the tone and keep the alliance on track.

Dermer's return to Washington

Dermer is no stranger to high-stakes U.S.-Israel negotiations. He served as Israel's ambassador to Washington from 2013 to 2021, a period that included the Obama administration and the first Trump administration. After his ambassadorship, he was appointed Netanyahu's strategic affairs minister, a role in which he coordinated sensitive policy files with Washington and other key capitals.

He was also involved in the Gaza hostage negotiations that led up to last October's ceasefire-and-hostage deal before stepping down from his formal government role in November. His decision to re-enter the scene now demonstrates how seriously Netanyahu views the current crisis with the White House.

Dermer's career in diplomacy goes back to his time as an adviser to Netanyahu in the 1990s. Born in Israel and educated in the United States, he has a unique ability to navigate both political systems. Over the years, he has built close relationships with American lawmakers, staffers, and presidential advisers. Those connections became especially valuable during the first Trump administration, when Israel pushed for recognition of Jerusalem as its capital and the Golan Heights as its territory, and during the negotiation of the Abraham Accords, which normalized ties between Israel and several Arab countries.

He has often been described as Netanyahu's closest adviser, with a level of trust that goes beyond formal titles. During his years in Washington, he was known for promoting a strong Israeli position on Iran and for maintaining an open line to successive administrations. His return to Washington now carries added significance because Netanyahu has pushed back against Trump's latest Gaza framework. For Netanyahu, sending Dermer is a signal that he still values the American alliance and wants to prevent a personal rupture from developing between the two leaders. For Washington, Dermer's arrival sends a message that Israel is willing to engage seriously rather than dismiss the plan outright.

Trump's Gaza framework

The current controversy began when Trump announced what he called a 'historic' breakthrough involving Hamas. The announcement described a proposed weapons decommissioning process in return for an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. According to reports, the framework would involve Hamas handing over weapons to a Palestinian force and storing them in Gaza, in exchange for a staged withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory.

The idea is modeled on the decommissioning process used in Northern Ireland during the peace process, when paramilitary groups placed arms beyond use under independent oversight. The choice of wording is significant. The plan does not specifically use the term 'disarmament,' which could be a deliberate attempt to allow Hamas to claim that it has not surrendered its arsenal or recognized defeat. This kind of face-saving formula is often used in delicate negotiations where the parties have spent years refusing to concede ideological positions.

The decommissioning model was used in Northern Ireland in the 2000s, when the Independent International Commission on Decommissioning monitored the destruction or putting beyond use of paramilitary weapons. Applying that model to Gaza would be unprecedented because Gaza remains an active conflict zone with multiple armed groups. The practical details would be difficult to implement, and the question of who would oversee and guarantee the process is still unresolved. Those are precisely the issues that Dermer will need to address with officials in Washington.

Israel has said it was not consulted before Trump announced the agreement. That statement has created an awkward public disagreement between two allies. U.S. officials, however, have disputed the Israeli claim, saying that an Israeli delegation was present during the final negotiations in El-Alamein, an Egyptian resort town where many sensitive meetings have taken place in recent months. The conflicting accounts have not made it any easier for Netanyahu to calm his political allies or for Trump to claim a diplomatic victory.

An Israeli government source described Dermer as someone who understands Washington better than almost anyone. 'No one understands or works with the Americans better than Dermer,' the source said. That reputation will be tested in the coming days, as Dermer attempts to convince American officials that Israel is not trying to obstruct a deal but also cannot accept a proposal that lacks clear solutions on security and Hamas's future role in Gaza.

Netanyahu's political dilemma

The disagreement puts Netanyahu in a difficult position, both diplomatically and domestically. Trump wants to show progress on his Gaza proposal, and he has a personal interest in presenting a successful foreign-policy result. Netanyahu, on the other hand, has long promised total victory over Hamas. That promise has shaped his political identity throughout the war. His governing coalition includes ultra-nationalist parties that are fiercely opposed to any arrangement that leaves Hamas in a position of authority, controls heavy weapons, or allows the armed group to claim that Israel has failed to achieve its declared goals.

Accepting the proposal could create immediate political problems at home. Netanyahu's coalition partners have previously threatened to leave the government if he agrees to a deal they view as a capitulation. If those parties depart, the government could collapse, triggering new elections at a time when Netanyahu is facing multiple security and legal challenges. Rejecting the proposal outright, however, risks damaging his relationship with Washington, which remains essential for Israel's military resupply, diplomatic cover, and long-term strategic positioning.

Israeli outlet Haaretz reported that U.S. officials were 'furious' over Netanyahu's response, although Trump had not publicly criticized his ally over the disagreement. The contrast between the reported private anger and the public silence indicates that both sides are trying to manage the crisis without openly breaking with each other. Dermer's trip is part of that effort.

The broader political context is also important. Netanyahu is leading a war-time government that has faced intense domestic criticism over the October 7 attack, the management of the hostage crisis, and the economic and social costs of a prolonged conflict. Every decision on Gaza is scrutinized through the lens of his political survival. A public clash with the American president would undermine the central strategic pillar of his government, but a decision to accept a framework that his own base hates would put him in direct conflict with the parties that keep him in office.

A test for the U.S.-Israel alliance

The Gaza dispute is a test of the U.S.-Israel alliance at a time when both leaders have strong incentives to remain close. Trump wants to claim that he can achieve peace in the Middle East, and he has invested personal prestige in his relationship with Netanyahu. Netanyahu needs the United States to maintain Israel's military edge in the region, to support its operations against Iranian threats, and to shield it from international diplomatic pressure. When those two sets of interests collide, the result is a complex negotiation filled with public statements and back-channel conversations.

The proposed Gaza framework is also an attempt to address the difficult question of what comes after the war. Hamas has controlled Gaza for years, and any lasting arrangement will need to address security, governance, reconstruction, and humanitarian needs. The idea of a phased Israeli withdrawal combined with a handover of weapons to a Palestinian force is one way to approach those issues, but it raises many unanswered questions: Which Palestinian force would receive the weapons? How would it be vetted? What would happen if Hamas retained hidden stockpiles? How would Israel ensure its own security during and after the withdrawal?

These are exactly the kinds of questions that Dermer will need to discuss with American officials in Washington. His experience in previous negotiations gives him the credibility to speak for Netanyahu without instantly turning the conversation into a confrontation. But he is not coming with an open-ended mandate. His trip is meant to clarify Israel's red lines and to see whether the American proposal can be adjusted in a way that allows Netanyahu to say yes without losing his government.

Broader security challenges

The Gaza dispute comes as Israel also faces changes within its security establishment. Roman Gofman, the newly appointed director of Mossad, has reportedly removed two senior officials who were involved in an unsuccessful plan to topple the Iranian regime. One of the removed officials was understood to have headed Mossad's intelligence directorate, while the other led its Iran division. Both are reportedly expected to remain within the agency in other positions as part of a wider reorganisation.

The shake-up at Mossad is significant for several reasons. It signals that Gofman intends to reshape the agency's priorities and leadership structure quickly. It also highlights the ongoing tension inside Israel's national security apparatus over how to deal with Iran and its nuclear program. The reported plan to topple the Iranian regime, which apparently failed, was clearly a high-profile operation that involved some of the agency's most senior professionals. Removing them from their positions could be seen as an effort to learn from failure or as an attempt to consolidate control under the new director.

Gofman's appointment has already drawn criticism from Netanyahu's opponents, who accuse the prime minister of trying to politicise Israel's traditionally neutral security apparatus. Those critics argue that changes at the top of Mossad, like other security appointments during the war, are being made with an eye toward political loyalty rather than professional excellence. The government, for its part, has defended the appointments as necessary for adapting to new threats and improving performance.

The combination of the Gaza diplomatic standoff and the shake-up at Mossad means that Israel's leadership is navigating multiple crises at once. The country faces continued conflict with Hamas, ongoing threats from Hezbollah and Iran, and a challenging relationship with its most important ally. Dermer's mission in Washington is only one piece of a much larger strategic puzzle, but it is a crucial one. How the current tensions are resolved will shape the next chapter of Israeli politics and U.S. influence in the Middle East.

Source: MSN News

Today's best fast chargers are designed to handle multiple devices at once, whether that's a phone, laptop, earbuds, or a smartwatch. Many models combine USB-C ports with a USB-A charger option to support older cables like Lightning, while newer designs focus on multi-port chargers that can intelligently distribute power across everything you plug in. Brands like Anker continue to refine their designs, with compact options that are easy to toss in a bag yet powerful enough for everyday use.

With so many wattages, port layouts, and standards to consider, finding the best fast charger depends on how and where you charge. Whether you want a simple wall adapter, a travel-friendly option, or a desktop hub built to power everything at once, this guide breaks down the essential facts and considerations for 2026.

Best fast chargers for 2026: Key facts

While the market is flooded with options, the standout fast chargers share several common traits. High wattage output (typically 30W to 100W or more), support for USB Power Delivery (USB PD) and PPS (Programmable Power Supply), and gallium nitride (GaN) technology are the hallmarks of top-tier adapters. GaN components allow for smaller, cooler-running bricks that can deliver high power without the bulk of older silicon-based chargers.

For phones, the most versatile chargers offer at least 45W to 65W of power, which can fast-charge most flagship smartphones and even some compact laptops. Multi-port models let you charge a phone and a laptop simultaneously, with dynamic power distribution that adjusts wattage based on connected devices. Many of the best chargers also include foldable prongs for easy travel, and some support a wide input voltage range (100-240V) for international use.

Another key trend for 2026 is the shift toward multi-port GaN chargers that replace the need for multiple wall warts. A 65W dual-port adapter can handle a MacBook and an iPhone at the same time, while a 100W or 140W desktop charger can power a heavy-duty laptop plus accessories. The best models prioritize safety features like overcurrent protection, overvoltage protection, and thermal regulation to prevent battery damage.

What to consider before buying a fast charger

Before you start looking at specific chargers, it's critical to determine three things: how many devices you need to charge, how much power they require, and whether or not you plan on traveling with any of them. This is especially true if you're charging a mix of devices that still rely on Lightning cables alongside newer USB-C gear.

The reason for the first question is simple. If you only need to charge a single device, like an iPhone or Android phone, it's cheaper and usually more space-efficient to get a lower-wattage charger with one port instead of two or three. Next, it's critical to figure out how much electricity your gadgets need because it doesn't make sense to buy a power brick that pushes out more juice than your device can actually use. This may sound a bit tricky, but most major manufacturers will list a product's max charging speeds in its tech specs, typically denoted by a specific wattage (15W, for example) or a quick-charge rating.

Unfortunately, very powerful or large laptops like gaming notebooks can suck a ton of juice (more than 140 watts), which means they may rely on more traditional power adapters with barrel plugs. This may result in them not being compatible with universal chargers. Some of these PCs may also support charging over USB-C, so even if a specific adapter can't deliver its full power draw, it can still send over some energy — but it will do so at a slower rate compared to the laptop's included charger. To get the best performance, using a high-quality fast charging cable, such as a USB-C cable with the proper power delivery rating, can make a big difference in maintaining consistent performance.

For frequent travelers, size and weight are often important considerations, because the bigger and heavier a charger is, the more annoying it will be to lug around. You'll also want to think about other factors like support for international plugs, which can be a big help to anyone who regularly visits other countries. If you're already traveling with power banks or a charging station, choosing a compact GaN charger can help streamline your gear.

Finally, you'll want to figure out if your smartphone uses a proprietary charging standard or if it's compatible with the USB Power Delivery spec (USB PD). For example, the OnePlus 13's included SuperVOOC power adapter can send up to 100 watts to the phone. However, if you use a generic USB-PD charger, speeds top out at 45 watts. That's still pretty quick, but not nearly as fast as the proprietary brick — and the same applies to devices with super fast charging support. Also, make sure your charging cable and connector are up to spec, as lower-quality accessories can bottleneck speeds or contribute to overheating during fast charging.

The role of wattage and power delivery

Understanding wattage is fundamental. A 5W charger might take hours to refill a modern smartphone, while a 20W charger can get an iPhone to 50% in about 30 minutes. For laptops, the stakes are even higher: a 60W charger can run a 13-inch ultrabook, but a 16-inch MacBook Pro may need 96W or more for full-speed charging. Many chargers support multiple protocols, including Qualcomm Quick Charge, Samsung Super Fast Charging, and USB PD PPS, which allows the charger to dynamically adjust voltage and current for optimal efficiency and reduced heat.

When selecting a multi-port charger, pay close attention to how power is shared. A 65W charger with two USB-C ports might deliver 45W through one port and 20W through the other when both are in use, but if you plug in two laptops, neither may receive enough power. The best multi-port chargers use intelligent power management to allocate power based on device priority, ensuring that a phone and laptop get what they need without tripping the breaker.

What is GaN?

When looking for chargers, you may notice that some are marked as GaN, which stands for gallium nitride. This is an important distinction because, when compared to older adapters that use silicon switches, GaN-based devices support increased power efficiency and output, allowing manufacturers to create more compact bricks that run cooler and support higher wattages.

Depending on the specific power output, GaN adapters can be 30 to 50 percent smaller and lighter than silicon-based alternatives. That might not sound like much, but when they're sitting in a bag alongside a laptop and a half dozen other accessories you might have, cutting down on excess bulk and weight goes a long way. GaN chargers also reduce energy loss during conversion, which means less heat generation and a longer lifespan for both the charger and the connected device.

Since GaN technology first became mainstream around 2018, it has revolutionized the charging market. Today, even budget-friendly GaN chargers offer features that were once reserved for premium models, such as fast charging protocols and safety certifications. As we move into 2026, GaN has become the standard for any serious fast charger, and it's hard to recommend a silicon-based alternative for most new purchases.

Do fast chargers affect battery life?

Technically yes, because the process of sending a ton of watts into a gadget and potentially generating additional heat while doing so can decrease battery health over time. That said, modern devices and chargers use various protocols to ensure temperatures and power levels stay within preset limits — in large part to avoid damaging the product or creating a safety risk. At a base level, simply charging a gadget regardless of speed will cause degradation over time (nothing stays perfect forever). So as long as you use compatible chargers and cables, the impact of fast charging is generally quite negligible.

Battery technology has also improved in recent years. Lithium-ion and lithium-polymer cells are designed to handle higher charge rates, and many phones have adaptive charging features that slow down the top 20% of the charge to reduce stress. Additionally, most fast chargers communicate with the device to maintain a safe voltage and current curve. For example, USB PD uses a negotiation process that ensures the charger and device agree on the output before sending power, preventing spikes that could damage the battery.

Still, extreme heat is the enemy of battery health. Leaving a phone on a fast charger overnight in a hot room can cause unnecessary wear. That's why many chargers now include thermal sensors and automatic shutdown features. If you want to prolong battery life, avoid using a fast charger in direct sunlight or while playing graphics-intensive games, and consider using a standard charger for overnight top-ups if your device lacks smart charging management.

What's the difference between a fast charger and a regular charger?

There isn't a single generally accepted definition of fast charging. However, with power adapters capable of sending as little as five watts or less, it's important to know how much juice your device is getting, especially if you need to recharge something quickly. So depending on who you ask (particularly when it comes to smartphones), any charger that can push out more than 15 to 18 watts is generally considered to be "fast." That said, with some phones capable of receiving more than 100 watts and up to 240 watts for some laptops, it's more important than ever to consider what devices you own before buying a new fast charger.

Regular chargers usually lack the negotiation circuitry that fast chargers use. A standard 5W or 10W adapter simply provides a steady voltage and current, which is fine for overnight charging but woefully inadequate when you're in a hurry. Fast chargers, on the other hand, dynamically raise the voltage or current to match the device's maximum supported rate, cutting charging times dramatically. For example, a 30W charger can recharge a typical smartphone from empty to 50% in about 25 minutes, while a 5W charger might take over an hour to achieve the same amount.

The distinction also matters for compatibility. Some older devices may not support fast charging at all, and using a high-wattage charger on such a device typically results in the device only drawing the amount it can handle, which is safe but not faster. However, mixing proprietary fast charging standards can lead to reduced speeds. For example, a charger with Qualcomm Quick Charge might not fast-charge a device that relies on USB PD or a proprietary standard like OnePlus's SuperVOOC. When in doubt, look for chargers that support multiple protocols, including PPS, which provides broader compatibility.

How to pick the right fast charger for your lifestyle

If you're a frequent traveler, a slim 30W or 45W GaN charger with one or two ports is often the best balance of portability and performance. This size can charge a phone, earbuds, and a Nintendo Switch, and sometimes a lightweight laptop if the output matches. For average users who need to charge a phone and a tablet simultaneously, a 65W dual- or tri-port charger is the sweet spot. These models are small enough to slip into a pocket but powerful enough to top up a MacBook Air or Thunderbolt laptop.

For families or people with many devices, a 100W or even 200W desktop charger with four or five ports can eliminate the need for a power strip. These larger bricks are ideal for a nightstand or office desk, and they often come with detachable AC cables for easier routing. Some premium models include USB-C and USB-A ports, plus output displays that show real-time wattage per port. While these chargers are bigger, they offer incredible convenience, especially if you're tired of swapping adapters among laptops, tablets, phones, and other gear.

An increasing number of chargers now include foldable prongs, which reduce bulk and protect other items in your bag. For international travelers, a charger with 100-240V input and multiple plug adapters is a wise investment. Some high-end models even have interchangeable plug heads, allowing you to switch between US, EU, UK, and AU outlets without a separate adapter.

Safety certifications are another critical factor. Look for UL, CE, FCC, or other relevant marks that indicate the charger has been tested for electrical and thermal safety. Many reputable brands also include a warranty and customer support, which is worth the slightly higher price. Knockoff chargers may be cheaper, but they often lack proper insulation and can damage your devices or pose a fire hazard.

Finally, the cable you use matters just as much as the charger itself. A high-quality USB-C cable with E-marker (electronic marker) rated for 100W or 240W ensures that power delivery is transparent and safe. Cheap cables without proper shielding can cause voltage drops, leading to slower charging and increased heat. If your charger supports multiple ports, consider color-coding cables for different devices so you know which cable goes where without fussing.

Charging safety and battery health: Best practices

To get the most out of your fast charger, avoid exposing it to extreme temperatures, and keep the vents clear. Unplug the charger when it's not in use to save power and reduce wear on the components. For devices with removable or older batteries, fast charging is generally safe, but it's wise to avoid charging while using the device for heavy tasks like gaming. Modern smartphones manage heat well, but physical removal from tight enclosures can help.

Many batteries reach 80% capacity after around 500 full charge cycles. Fast charging alone doesn't dramatically shorten battery life, but heat does. If you're charging in a warm environment, consider using a lower-wattage charger or enabling the device's battery-saver charging mode. Most newer phones and laptops feature optimized charging that pauses at 80% and resumes to 100% based on your routine, which can significantly slow battery degradation.

As we look toward 2026, USB-C has become the universal standard, and legacy USB-A ports are disappearing from high-end chargers. If you still own older devices with micro-USB or proprietary ports, keep a spare cable or adapter handy, but focus on future-proofing your setup by choosing a charger with multiple USB-C ports. This ensures that your investment will support years of new devices to come.

Source: Engadget News

Best power banks for 2026

Best MagSafe power bank: Anker MagGo Power Bank (10K)

The Anker MagGo Power Bank was one of the first Qi2-certified devices to ship, and the new wireless standard makes this MagSafe-style battery far faster than early magnetic packs. It has a 10,000mAh capacity, 15W wireless output, one USB-C in/out port, and a USB-C cable. In testing, it charged a nearly dead iPhone 15 to 50 percent in about 45 minutes. That is roughly three times faster than the previous generation. It still had enough power left for another charge, taking the phone to 70 percent.

• Capacity: 10,000mAh
• Maximum output: 15W wireless
• Ports: one USB-C in/out
• Weight: 8.82 oz

The built-in display shows the battery percentage and an estimate of time remaining. The magnetic hold is strong, so you can use the phone while it charges, and the kickstand props it up for video or StandBy mode. Qi2 also means Pixel 10 phones get 15W magnetic charging. The USB-C port makes the battery useful for non-Qi2 devices. The main downside is price: it costs more than many other MagSafe packs.

Pros

• Fast Qi2 wireless charging
• Sturdy kickstand
• Battery percentage display

Cons

• Pricier than rivals

Best portable charger for Android: Anker Nano Battery (Foldable USB-C)

The Anker Nano battery is shaped like a small lipstick case and has a built-in USB-C connector that folds when not in use. That means you never have to remember a cable or adapter. It packs 5,000mAh, delivers up to 22.5W, and has a second USB-C port for refilling the bank or charging another device. In our tests, it took a depleted Galaxy S23 Ultra to 65 percent in about an hour. It is small enough to use while walking and handy for earbuds too.

• Capacity: 5,000mAh
• Maximum output: 22.5W
• Ports: one USB-C and one USB-C connector
• Weight: 3.5 oz

For more power, Anker's 30W Nano Power Bank offers 10,000mAh and a display; its built-in USB-C cable doubles as a carry loop. The smaller Nano is affordable and extremely portable. Its only downside is that it is small enough to lose.

Pros

• Very portable
• Affordable

Cons

• Small enough to get misplaced

Best low-capacity power bank: Anker 10K Fusion

The Anker 10K Fusion solves common power bank annoyances with a built-in USB-C cable and foldable wall prongs. You can plug the battery straight into an outlet to recharge it, and use the attached cable for your phone. It has 10,000mAh capacity, 30W output, and an extra USB-C port. It took a Galaxy S23 Ultra from five percent to full in just over an hour, and an iPhone 15 from five to 45 percent in 20 minutes. The display gives an accurate remaining percentage. A previous favorite, the BioLite Charge 40 PD, remains a durable alternative, but the 10K Fusion delivers faster charging and more features for a lower price.

• Capacity: 10,000mAh
• Maximum output: 30W
• Ports: one USB-C in/out, one USB-C in/out cable, wall prongs
• Weight: 8.8 oz

Pros

• Built-in USB-C cable
• Built-in wall prongs
• Accurate display
• Affordable

Cons

• iPhone charging is slower than some rivals

Best medium-capacity power bank: Belkin BoostCharge 20K with Integrated Cable

The Belkin BoostCharge 20K has a built-in magnetized USB-C cable, plus one USB-A and one USB-C port. The 20,000mAh battery can charge a phone about three times. It outputs 30W, which is not the fastest, but it still charged a Galaxy S24 Ultra from empty to full in one hour and 15 minutes, and an iPhone 15 from five to 87 percent in just over an hour. It comes in black, blue, pink and white. The four indicator LEDs are accurate, though there is no digital percentage display.

• Capacity: 20,000mAh
• Maximum output: 30W
• Ports: one USB-C in/out cable, one USB-A port, one USB-C port
• Weight: 14 oz

Pros

• Handy built-in cable
• Four color options
• Great capacity for the price

Cons

• Charging is not the fastest

Best medium-high capacity power bank: Nimble Champ Pro

The Nimble Champ Pro delivers excellent speed for its price. It has a 20,000mAh capacity, 65W maximum output, and two USB-C in/out ports. It charged a Galaxy S23 Ultra from five percent to full in under an hour, and supplied nearly three full charges to an iPhone or Galaxy. It also refills from a wall outlet quickly. Nimble is a certified B Corp, and the Champ Pro is made from 90 percent post-consumer plastic. The marbled finish comes from recycled materials. The only issue is that the four indicator LEDs sometimes underestimated the remaining charge in early tests, though accuracy improved later.

• Capacity: 20,000mAh
• Maximum output: 65W
• Ports: two USB-C in/out
• Weight: 12.9 oz

Pros

• Super fast charging
• Made from recycled materials
• Sturdy and compact design

Cons

• Indicator lights underestimated charge

Best multi-device power bank: BioLite Charge 100 Max

The BioLite Charge 100 Max is compact and rounded for travel. It has a 25,000mAh capacity, 120W total output, four USB ports and a 15W MagSafe-compatible wireless pad. It delivered five iPhone 15 charges, four Galaxy S23 Ultra charges, more than two iPad Air charges, and a partial MacBook Pro charge. The rubberized texture and yellow accents make it stand out. BioLite is a climate neutral-certified B Corp that supports off-grid energy projects. The main drawback is price: it costs more than some similar-capacity rivals.

• Capacity: 25,000mAh
• Maximum total output: 120W
• Ports: wireless pad, two USB-C, one USB-A, one USB-C
• Weight: 1.28 lbs

Pros

• Compact and colorful design
• Charges phones, tablets and laptops quickly
• Climate neutral certified

Cons

• More expensive than similar-capacity batteries

Best laptop power bank: Anker Laptop Power Bank with Built-in Cable

This Anker bank includes two built-in USB-C cables, one attached as a carry handle and one retractable up to two feet. Both support input and output. It has a 25,000mAh capacity, 165W maximum output, a USB-A port and a USB-C port. The display shows remaining charge, output wattage and refill time. In testing, it refilled a MacBook Pro from near-dead to about 68 percent in 53 minutes, and a Galaxy S23 Ultra in 52 minutes. It costs only a little more than Anker's popular PowerCore bank but includes the cables. The screen is prone to smudges.

• Capacity: 25,000mAh
• Maximum output: 165W
• Ports: two USB-C in/out cables, one USB-A port, one USB-C port
• Weight: 1.31 lbs

Pros

• Two built-in USB-C cables
• Durable build
• Detailed display
• Fast charging

Cons

• Screen picks up smudges

Best premium power bank: Anker Prime Power Bank 26K 300W

The Anker Prime 26K 300W is one of the most powerful banks we have tested. It has 26,250mAh capacity, 300W combined output, two 140W USB-C ports and one 22.5W USB-A port. It charged an iPhone 15 from near-dead to 60 percent in 30 minutes and delivered more charge to a MacBook Pro than any other bank in our tests. The display shows remaining charge and battery temperature. It pairs with an app for detailed stats, though the built-in display already offers most of that information. The battery is sleek and compact, and an optional charging base adds convenience but costs extra. It is expensive, especially with the base.

• Capacity: 26,250mAh
• Maximum combined output: 300W
• Ports: two USB-C, one USB-A
• Weight: 1.32 lbs

Pros

• Super fast charging
• Sleek premium design
• Display shows charge and temperature

Cons

• Pricey, especially with optional base

Best power bank for outdoors: Nestout 15000mAh Outdoor Battery Power Bank

The Nestout battery has an IP67 rating, meaning it can survive being submerged in about one meter of water for up to 30 minutes. We dropped it in a bucket of water for five minutes and it continued to work perfectly after drying. Rubber gaskets and screw-on caps protect the ports. It also survived repeated drops from chest height. It has a 15,000mAh capacity, 32W maximum output, one USB-C in/out, one USB-C input and one USB-A output. Charging speeds are a little slower than some competitors, and the included cable is only seven inches long. Nestout sells a worklight, tripod and solar panel as accessories; the compact solar panel filled the battery to 40 percent in under three hours.

• Capacity: 15,000mAh
• Maximum output: 32W
• Ports: one USB-C in/out, one USB-C in, one USB-A
• Weight: 12.8 oz

Pros

• Waterproof with caps secured
• Clever accessories
• Survived drop tests

Cons

• Not the fastest charge times
• Included cable is short

What to look for in a portable battery pack

Battery type

Nearly every rechargeable power bank uses a lithium-ion battery. These offer a strong size-to-charge ratio and have become more energy-dense over time. They do not suffer from the memory effect that plagues older battery chemistries.

Flying with portable batteries

Because lithium-ion cells can overheat, airlines and regulators restrict them. The current rules allow external batteries rated at 100Wh or less to fly in carry-on baggage, not checked luggage. All of our picks meet that limit. Some airlines have added extra rules, such as keeping an active power bank in view while using it.

Capacity

Capacity is listed in milliamp hours (mAh). A 5,000mAh bank can top up a phone to around 50 to 75 percent. A 20,000mAh to 25,000mAh bank can recharge phones many times and often a laptop. Remember that efficiency is not 100 percent: in our tests, a 10,000mAh battery delivered roughly 5,800mAh to a phone; a 20,000mAh delivered about 11,250mAh; and a 25,000mAh delivered about 16,200mAh. Expect around 60 percent efficiency after voltage conversion and heat loss.

Wireless charging

Wireless charging is less efficient than wired, but it is convenient. Qi2-certified batteries support up to 15W and magnetic alignment. iPhones and Pixel 10 phones can use that standard. Newer Qi2 25W devices, including iPhone 17 and Pixel 10 Pro XL, are beginning to appear, and the first 25W batteries are arriving. For now, a Qi2 15W bank is a reliable choice for most phones.

Ports

USB-C delivers faster charging than USB-A, and most recommended banks have at least one USB-C port. Larger banks list different wattages per port, so check the labels. A 100W port can charge a phone quickly, but a 15W port will not do much for a laptop. Cables also have wattage limits, so use a cable that can handle the speed. Built-in USB-C cables are increasingly common and eliminate one item to remember.

Design

Power banks now come in many colors, shapes and finishes. Some add MagSafe compatibility, kickstands, wall plugs, displays or built-in cables. Most have indicator lights to show remaining charge. A digital display is more precise. Choose a design that fits how you travel and what you carry.

How we test power banks

We start by looking at established brands and customer reviews, then buy the most promising models and test them in real conditions. For each battery, we discharge a phone or laptop to between zero and five percent, then charge it using the power bank until the device is full or the bank dies. We test iPhones, Android phones, iPads and laptops depending on the battery's capacity. We also measure charge time, output wattage, physical size, build quality and extra features. We update this guide as new products are released.

Other power banks we tested

Belkin Stage PowerGrip

This 9,300mAh battery is also a Bluetooth camera-style shutter with a tripod thread. It magnetically attaches to iPhones and charges wirelessly, but its charging speed is slow; it took about two hours to get an iPhone 16 from three to 98 percent. It is useful for mobile photography.

Anker MagGo for Apple Watch power bank

This 10K battery has a pop-up Apple Watch charger and a built-in USB-C cable. It is a niche product, but it can keep your phone and watch alive while traveling.

HyperJuice 245W

Hyper's 27,000mAh brick is compact and attractive, with four USB-C ports. It charges a phone about four times and a MacBook Pro to 75 percent. The lack of USB-A and the price keep it from earning a top pick.

EcoFlow Rapid magnetic power bank

The first power bank from EcoFlow is a Qi2 magnetic 5,000mAh model with a fold-out stand and attached cable. It looks good but did not match the charging speed or capacity of our MagSafe pick.

Mophie Snap+ Powerstation Mini

This 5,000mAh magnetic battery is well built, but its capacity is too small for a full phone charge, and our top MagSafe pick offers twice the capacity for only $20 more.

Power bank FAQs

What's the difference between a portable power bank and a portable charger?

The terms are often used interchangeably. They all refer to a lithium-ion battery that stores energy and refills a phone, tablet, earbuds, laptop or other device. What matters is capacity, size, weight and ports. Power stations are different: they are large units that can power multiple appliances but cannot be flown.

Does fast charging ruin your battery?

Fast charging creates more heat, and heat is the main enemy of battery health. Modern phones include heat shields and software to manage temperature. Studies on similar lithium-ion packs suggest a slight capacity loss from frequent fast charging, but ambient heat makes a bigger difference. Normal fast charging is generally safe.

Can you use a power bank for all your devices?

It depends on the bank capacity and your device. A small 5,000mAh bank will not charge a laptop, but a 20,000mAh or larger bank can provide a partial laptop charge. Most USB devices work with power banks, but devices with DC or AC ports require specialty batteries or power stations.

Source: Engadget News

Quick picks for 2026

• Best overall E Ink tablet: reMarkable 2
• Best premium E Ink tablet: reMarkable Paper Pro
• Best e-reader E Ink tablet: Amazon Kindle Scribe
• Best E Ink tablet for writing: Supernote A6 X2
• Best color Android E Ink tablet: Onyx Boox Note Air4 C
• Best big-screen E Ink tablet: Onyx Boox Note Max

Best E Ink tablets for 2026

reMarkable 2: Best overall

The reMarkable 2 is the best E Ink tablet for most people thanks to its balance of performance and ease of use. Its 10.3-inch monochrome touchscreen is ideal for writing and reading, and the low-latency pen feels almost like ink on paper. You can import documents from Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, and reMarkable's own cloud. The tablet supports PDF and EPUB files, and Chrome users can send articles straight to the device. The base tablet costs $399, but a stylus is an additional cost unless you choose a bundle.

reMarkable Paper Pro: Best premium

The reMarkable Paper Pro is a step up in almost every way. It has an 11.8-inch color E Ink display, 64GB of storage, and a faster processor. The color screen allows for vibrant highlights and color-coded notes, and the improved response time makes writing feel more fluid. At $629, it is one of the pricier E Ink tablets we have tested, but it is also one of the most refined.

Amazon Kindle Scribe: Best e-reader E Ink tablet

The Amazon Kindle Scribe is the best choice for avid Kindle readers who also want to take notes. The latest model has a large 11-inch display, an improved front light, and a faster processor than older versions. It supports direct annotation in Kindle books, sticky notes, and separate notebooks. The included premium pen attaches magnetically and feels comfortable in hand. Prices start at $500 for the version with a front light, and a color version, the Scribe Colorsoft, costs $630.

Supernote A6 X2: Best for writing and note-taking

If your primary focus is handwriting, the Supernote A6 X2 is an excellent fit. It has a 7.8-inch screen, a replaceable battery, and a microSD slot for up to 2TB of extra storage. The software offers robust organization tools, including keywords, stars, and handwriting recognition. You can also create your own page templates. The A6 X2 sells for $329, but the pen is sold separately, which is worth remembering when budgeting.

Onyx Boox Note Air4 C: Another color option

The Onyx Boox Note Air4 C runs Android 13, giving you access to the Google Play Store and apps such as Kindle, Kobo, and Evernote. Its 10.3-inch color E Ink panel is great for reading and note-taking, and the included stylus ships in the box. Because it is an Android tablet, you can also use a web browser and attach files from third-party apps. At $529, it is competitively priced for a color model with full app support.

Onyx Boox Note Max: Big-screen option

For people who want a larger canvas, the Boox Note Max has a 13.3-inch E Ink display. It is ideal for viewing A4-sized documents, taking notes during meetings, and using the built-in Calendar Memo app. It runs Android 13 and comes with a stylus and cover. The $689 price is justified for those who need the extra screen real estate, but there is no front light, so reading in the dark is not recommended.

Honorable mention: reMarkable Paper Pro Move

The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a compact version of the Paper Pro with a 7.3-inch color display. It has the same refined hardware, good battery life, and note-taking tools in a more portable body. The Move costs $449 with the standard marker and is a nice middle ground for people who want a smaller, cheaper reMarkable without losing the premium feel.

Honorable mention: Kobo Libra Colour

The Kobo Libra Colour is more of an e-reader than a full tablet, but it supports stylus input for margin notes and basic notebooks. It has a 7-inch color screen, physical page-turn buttons, and integration with Dropbox and Google Drive. The optional Kobo Stylus adds highlighters, pens, and handwriting conversion. With the stylus included, it costs around $300, making it a good budget alternative to the Kindle Scribe.

Are E Ink tablets worth it?

E Ink tablets are worth it for readers and note-takers who value long battery life and a distraction-free environment. They are not meant to replace a regular tablet. Browsing the web, watching videos, and playing games are better on an LCD or OLED screen. But for writing, sketching, and reading long documents, an E Ink tablet can be more comfortable and easier on the eyes. Most models also last for weeks or months on a single charge, so you can leave your charger behind.

What to look for in an E Ink tablet

Writing and latency

The writing experience is the most important part of any E Ink tablet. Check for low pen latency, good pressure sensitivity, and a comfortable stylus. Some tablets include the stylus, while others require a separate purchase. The texture of the screen also affects how closely the tablet replicates paper, so pay attention to that if you plan to write for long stretches.

Reading

Think about where you buy your e-books. If you use Kindle or Kobo, a tablet from the same brand will give you the simplest access to your library. For PDFs and EPUBs, an Android-based E Ink tablet or a device with broad file support may be better. Screen size matters too: larger screens are great for annotations, but small tablets are easier to hold while reading.

Search functionality

Searching handwritten notes is a key advantage of E Ink tablets. Many models now offer handwriting recognition, keyword bookmarks, and the ability to turn scribbles into typed text. If you plan to take thousands of notes, look for a tablet with reliable search and organization tools.

Sharing and connectivity

You will probably want to access your notes on another device. Most E Ink tablets support Wi-Fi syncing with mobile apps, cloud drives, or email. Some offer Bluetooth for keyboards or headphones. Choose a model that works with the cloud services you already use, such as Google Drive, OneDrive, or Dropbox.

Price

E Ink tablets cost anywhere from $300 to more than $800. Color screens, larger displays, and Android support push prices higher. Styluses are often sold separately, so check the included accessories. With prices on the rise, it is worth deciding which features matter most to you before making a purchase.

Other E Ink tablets we've tested

Onyx Boox Tab X C

The Boox Tab X C is a powerful Android E Ink tablet with a 13.3-inch color display. It costs more than $800 and is best for people who want a premium, large-screen color e-paper device.

Lenovo Smart Paper

Lenovo's Smart Paper offers solid hardware but depends heavily on Lenovo's cloud service. The software is less flexible than competitors, and the subscription price can add up, so it did not make our top picks.

Onyx Boox Tab Ultra

The Boox Tab Ultra runs Android and can be used with a keyboard case, but its E Ink screen is better for reading and note-taking. For those who need a full traditional tablet, a standard 2-in-1 laptop is almost always a better choice.

Source: Engadget News

Some handhelds are designed for quick sessions and classic libraries, prioritizing simplicity, long battery life, and pocketable designs. Others blur the line between console and PC, offering large screens, powerful chips, and access to massive game libraries—often at the cost of size, price, or endurance. There are even experimental options that focus on unusual controls or intentionally limited experiences.

We've spent months testing the fast-moving handheld space to determine which devices are actually worth your money in 2026. Whether you're looking for a versatile all-rounder, a premium portable gaming PC, or a dedicated machine for retro games, these are the gaming handhelds that stand out.

Best Handheld Gaming Devices for 2026

Steam Deck: Best Handheld Gaming PC for Most People

The Steam Deck remains the best balance of price, performance, and usability in the handheld gaming PC market. The Steam Deck OLED, starting at $549 for 512GB of storage, features a 7.4-inch HDR OLED display that's brighter, faster, and more vivid than the 7-inch IPS panel on the entry-level model. The OLED's improved contrast and richer colors make every game look better, and the 90Hz refresh rate adds smoothness. Thanks to a more efficient AMD APU and larger battery, the OLED model also lasts longer, with Valve rating it for three to twelve hours depending on the game.

The entry-level LCD Steam Deck at $399 delivers the same core experience for $150 less. It's a fantastic budget option for those who don't need the premium screen. However, the hardware is aging—many of the most graphically demanding games released in the past couple of years won't run well, if at all. Linux and anti-cheat issues also render some live-service games like Destiny 2 and Apex Legends unplayable. Still, the Deck can play thousands of Steam titles, from Elden Ring to Balatro, with user-friendly SteamOS and excellent emulation potential via tools like EmuDeck.

Its biggest issue is its size: nearly a foot long and two inches thick, it stretches the definition of a "handheld" even if the OLED version is lighter. The LCD model can get warm and noisy, and the d-pad is mushy. But the contoured grips, responsive buttons, and dual touchpads make it a capable, well-built machine.

• Pros: Plays many modern PC games, user-friendly interface, vivid OLED option, excellent value, superb emulation performance
• Cons: Bulky, not the most powerful hardware, limited Steam compatibility with some games and other storefronts

Lenovo Legion Go S (SteamOS): Best Premium Handheld Gaming PC

The Lenovo Legion Go S is the closest thing to a Steam Deck 2. It's the first third-party device to natively run SteamOS, giving it Valve's clean interface while packing modern hardware. The configuration we tested includes an AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme processor, 32GB of RAM, and a 1TB SSD, with a maximum power draw of 33W (40W plugged in). This makes it significantly more powerful than the Steam Deck, offering far more headroom to hit 60fps in many recent AAA games.

Its 8-inch IPS display runs at a sharp 1920x1200 resolution with a 120Hz refresh rate and variable refresh rate (VRR), which minimizes screen tearing. It's not OLED, so colors aren't as vivid and there's no HDR, but it's a strong panel. The design is chunkier and heavier than the Steam Deck, though many will prefer its offset joysticks and textured grips. Hall effect sensors and dual USB-C ports add value.

The main drawback is price: the Z1 Extreme version costs $900. A cheaper configuration with a Ryzen Z2 Go chip, 16GB of RAM, and 512GB storage sells for $650, but we haven't tested it yet. Battery life is also somewhat shorter than the Deck's, and the fans get loud under load.

• Pros: Better performance than Steam Deck, official SteamOS, spacious display with VRR, good ergonomics
• Cons: Pricey, heavier than Steam Deck, no HDR support, weak haptics

ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X: Best Windows Gaming Handheld

If you want the flexibility of Windows, the ASUS ROG Xbox Ally X is our favorite Windows-based handheld. Despite the Xbox branding, it's not an Xbox—it's a Windows 11 PC with a new "Xbox full screen experience" that aggregates PC games from multiple storefronts, including Steam. This makes it easier to navigate with a controller, though Windows quirks still remain.

Performance is a key selling point: the Ryzen Z2 Extreme chip and 24GB of RAM, combined with a 35W boost mode, let it run demanding AAA games far better than the Steam Deck. The 7-inch 1080p 120Hz display with VRR isn't as colorful as an OLED, but it's sharp and VRR keeps motion smooth. You also get the freedom to play games from any PC client, including Xbox Game Pass and Epic, without workarounds.

It's expensive at $1,000, and it's bulky and heavy. Batteries are better than most Windows handhelds—we got about three and a half hours in demanding games—but the experience requires occasional tinkering. The controls feel like an Xbox controller, with comfortable grips and tight buttons. If you value software flexibility over simplicity, this is the premium pick.

• Pros: More powerful than Steam Deck, works with any Windows client, 1080p 120Hz VRR display, comfortable grips, full-screen Xbox experience
• Cons: Expensive, bulky, Windows 11 still has quirks on handhelds, lackluster haptics, no included case

Retroid Pocket 5: Best Mobile Gaming Handheld for Most People

The Retroid Pocket 5 is an Android-based handheld designed primarily for emulating classic games. Powered by a Snapdragon 865 chip and 8GB of RAM, it can handle most PlayStation 2 and GameCube games at full speed with upscaling, plus everything from PSP and Dreamcast down to N64 and PS1 flawlessly. The 5.5-inch 1080p OLED display is beautiful, and the device feels sturdy for its $219 price.

However, it requires a lot of tinkering. Setting up emulators, sourcing ROMs, and tweaking settings can be tedious. Some games need custom drivers or special configurations. The joystick placement also isn't ideal for modern games, though the Hall effect sticks should resist drift. Battery life ranges from three hours with demanding Android games to over ten hours with older emulation.

For those willing to put in the work, the Pocket 5 is an excellent value for retro enthusiasts.

• Pros: Capable emulation and Android gaming performance, lovely OLED display, great sticks and buttons, portable design
• Cons: Requires lots of tinkering for optimal emulation, awkward joystick layout for modern games

Retroid Pocket Flip 2: Another Good Option

The Retroid Pocket Flip 2 is essentially a Pocket 5 in a clamshell design, running the same chip and featuring the same OLED display and Hall effect joysticks. It costs $229 and offers extra protection for the screen, making it easier to toss in a bag. The clamshell shape provides more space for controls, with offset joysticks that feel less cramped than the Pocket 5's layout. However, it's thicker and heavier, the joysticks are recessed, and the face buttons and d-pad could be larger. If you prefer a DS-style form factor over the PSP-like Pocket 5, this is the one to get.

• Pros: Capable emulation performance, sturdy clamshell design, lovely OLED display
• Cons: Requires tinkering, recessed joysticks, small buttons and d-pad

AYN Odin 2: Best Mobile Gaming Handheld Overall

For those with more to spend, the AYN Odin 2 steps up performance with a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip. It starts at $299 and can play everything the Retroid models can, but smoother and more reliably. PS2 and GameCube games run at two to three times native resolution, and even many Switch games are playable. The hardware is refined, with comfortable curved grips, offset Hall effect joysticks, a crisp 6-inch 1080p display, and a superb battery that can last over eight hours even on demanding emulation.

It's pricier than the Retroid Pocket 5, and at that price the entry-level Steam Deck offers native PC gaming for just $100 more. But if you want a compact emulation machine that handles nearly everything you throw at it, the Odin 2 is the gold standard—just know that AYN has released a newer Odin 3 that we haven't tested yet.

• Pros: Excellent emulation performance, comfortable design, great battery life
• Cons: Relatively pricey, emulator setup can be laborious, docked experience isn't seamless

Analogue Pocket: Best Game Boy-Style Handheld

If you want an actual Game Boy experience, the Analogue Pocket is the ultimate choice. It uses FPGA hardware to play original Game Boy, Game Boy Color, and Game Boy Advance cartridges with near-perfect accuracy. The 3.5-inch display is incredibly sharp and backlit, with filters that mimic classic screens. It can also play Game Gear, TurboGrafx-16, Neo Geo Pocket, and Atari Lynx games via adapters, and community updates have added ROM support for systems like SNES and Genesis.

At $220, it's pricey, but the build quality is premium. The shoulder buttons are a bit spongy, and stock shortages are common. Still, for fans of real cartridges, nothing else matches its polish and accuracy.

• Pros: Near-perfect cartridge playback, gorgeous display, impressive build quality, expandable via adapters
• Cons: Stock issues, spongy shoulder buttons, tiny volume buttons

Playdate: Honorable Mention

The Playdate is a quirky handheld from Panic with a 2.7-inch monochrome display, a physical crank, and a library of delightful indie games. It's tiny, well-built, and charming, but at $229 it's a niche luxury. The display isn't backlit, and it only plays specially made games. If you're looking for a fun, low-key companion device, it's entertaining, but most people should prioritize more versatile handhelds.

What About the Nintendo Switch 2?

The Nintendo Switch 2 has become hugely popular, but we haven't made it a formal pick in this guide because it exists in its own world. It's the only device that can play new Nintendo exclusives like Donkey Kong Bananza, and its upgraded hardware—a 7.9-inch display, magnetic Joy-Cons, and improved performance—makes it a compelling console. However, its game library is still limited, and it doesn't offer the flexibility of a Steam Deck or an emulation handheld. Unless you're eager for Nintendo's exclusives or worried about potential price hikes, it's not a must-buy yet.

Other Handhelds We've Tested

Lenovo Legion Go 2

The Legion Go 2 boasts an 8.8-inch OLED display with VRR and detachable controllers. It's powerful but weighs over two pounds, performs slightly worse than the ROG Ally X, and costs $1,100 or more. It's a lovely luxury device, but not the best value.

MSI Claw 8 AI+

The Claw 8 AI+ offers strong performance with an Intel Core Ultra 7 chip, a bright 8-inch display, and good battery life. At $1,100, it's hard to justify over the ROG Ally X, which is lighter and easier to grip.

ModRetro Chromatic

This FPGA handheld plays Game Boy cartridges but requires three AA batteries and doesn't support save states. It also can't play GBA games or ROMs. Its $200 price is tough to swallow compared to the Analogue Pocket. Additionally, founder Palmer Luckey's involvement with defense technology may give some buyers pause.

Lenovo Legion Go S (Windows, Z2 Go)

The Windows version of the Legion Go S with the Z2 Go chip lags in performance and still suffers from Windows clunkiness, making it a hard sell at $730.

Ayaneo Flip DS

A dual-screen clamshell Windows handheld, the Flip DS is a fun concept but has short battery life, weak controls, and a high price. It's niche and not recommended for most.

Ayaneo Kun

The Kun is a powerful and large Windows handheld with an 8.4-inch display and up to 64GB of RAM. But it's heavy, lacks VRR, and is now outpaced by newer devices.

Retroid Pocket Classic

A Game Boy-style Android handheld with a Snapdragon G1 Gen 2 chip and a vibrant OLED display. It's a good value at $129, though software emulation isn't as polished as FPGA options.

Retroid Pocket Mini

A smaller version of the Pocket 5 with a 4:3 display, ideal for older retro consoles. It's good but pricier than the Classic and has a small screen for modern games.

Retroid Pocket 4 Pro and 4

The Pocket 4 Pro remains a decent budget pick with performance close to the Pocket 5, but it lacks the OLED display and better ergonomics. The base Pocket 4 is weaker for PS2 and GameCube.

Miyoo Mini Plus

A cheap Game Boy-style handheld with a nice screen and extensive customization. It's good for older games, but the build and software require tweaking.

TrimUI Brick

Another low-cost vertical handheld with a metal back and sharp display. Its buttons are stiff and the stock UI is rough, but custom firmware helps.

Anbernic RG35XX Plus and RG35XXSP

These are wallet-friendly vertical and clamshell options, but their software is sloppy, and there have been quality control concerns with the SP's battery.

Anbernic RG405M

A 4-inch metal handheld that's slower than the Retroid Pocket Mini and lacks its OLED display.

PlayStation Portal

The Portal streams games from a PS5 over Wi-Fi. It lacks native apps and Bluetooth earbud support, making it a niche accessory for PS5 owners.

Logitech G Cloud

The G Cloud has a nice display and long battery life, but at $300 it doesn't offer enough power compared to the Retroid Pocket 5.

What to Know About the Gaming Handheld Market

The market breaks down into three tiers. At the top are x86 portable gaming PCs like the Steam Deck and ROG Ally X. They offer the most power and can play modern PC games, but they're large, heavy, and expensive, with battery life that can be short.

Next are mobile handhelds like the Retroid Pocket and AYN Odin 2. These run Android or Linux, cost from under $50 to $400, and are more compact. They can't play modern AAA PC games, but they excel at emulation and cloud streaming. Keep in mind that emulator setup is complex, and downloading ROMs may be legally murky unless you back up games you already own.

The final tier consists of "handhelds that do their own thing," such as the Nintendo Switch 2 and Playdate. These run customized software and offer unique game libraries. They're often easier to use and have broad appeal, but they lack the versatility of PCs and emulation devices.

Recent Updates

In November 2025, the ROG Xbox Ally X became our favorite Windows option, and we added notes on the Legion Go 2, ModRetro Chromatic, and several emulation handhelds. We're still testing the newer Retroid and AYN models. In August, we highlighted the SteamOS Legion Go S and the Switch 2. Previous updates covered the Retroid Pocket Flip 2, MSI Claw 8 AI+, and other evolving picks. The market is moving quickly, and new devices are always on the horizon.

Source: Engadget News

The controversy began with an otherwise ordinary video on Complexly, the educational channel co-founded by Green and his brother, author John Green. In the middle of the video, Green incongruously said, "I appreciate the pushback." Viewers immediately speculated that the phrase had been generated by a chatbot, and that Green had accidentally included a response from ChatGPT to one of his own prompts while reading the script aloud.

The Accidental Slip

It was an odd moment. The phrase "I appreciate the pushback" is common in AI-generated responses, particularly when a user challenges a chatbot's initial answer. It appears frequently in ChatGPT conversations. In the context of a scripted educational video, it made no sense. Within hours, online sleuths had connected the dots, and the backlash was quick and fierce.

Green initially responded to a since-deleted post on X (formerly Twitter). He explained that he had produced the video "under a ton of pressure" and had used ChatGPT "for research on this script." However, he maintained that the "pushback" line was actually addressed to the episode's guest, not a leftover from an AI interaction. That explanation did little to quell the criticism, as many noted that the phrase still felt out of place.

A More Personal Apology

Green followed up with a longer and more personal apology on Reddit. He said he was "mortified" by the situation and felt he had "let so many people down." He announced plans to reduce his video production schedule as a direct result of this incident.

In his Reddit post, Green insisted that he had only used ChatGPT to "locate papers and other resources for learning about topics." He argued that the words and the "takes" in his videos have still been his own, and that AI was merely a research aid. At the same time, he admitted that it was fair for critics to accuse him of "diluting" himself by relying on such tools.

"Ultimately, what I am most scared of is ruining myself for people, but I have not been managing my impulses well," Green wrote. "You need to know that my words are mine. I don't think that this hasn't been true, but I've been moving so fast that my own process isn't actually clear to me and I want to have it be a guarantee moving forward."

Not an AI Hater, But Deeply Concerned

Green was careful to clarify that he is "not a pure AI-hater." He acknowledged the potential benefits of AI tools for creativity and productivity. However, he also listed a number of serious concerns about the technology. These include its impact on climate change, the environmental cost of training large models, and what he called "the speed at which these companies are trying to consolidate economic power."

His comments resonate with a broader debate about AI and creative labor. Many artists, writers, and YouTubers fear that AI-generated content will flood the market, devaluing human work and making it harder for independent creators to stand out. Others worry about the concentration of power in a few tech companies that control the infrastructure of AI.

A Warning About Dopamine

Perhaps the most striking part of Green's apology was his admission about his own psychology. He said that interacting with large language models gave him a "dopamine" hit that was hard to resist. "But mostly I need to come to terms with the fact that the level of dopamine I've been getting from interacting with LLMs…with doing more and more and more and more…is not healthy for me or good for the world," he said. "It is careless, and has disconnected me from where people are on this."

That candid admission has drawn sympathy from many fans, who appreciate his honesty about the addictive nature of AI tools. It also highlights a growing concern among mental health professionals about how AI chatbots and generative systems can exploit human psychological vulnerabilities.

Who Is Hank Green?

Hank Green is not an obscure YouTuber. He is one of the most recognizable figures in the online educational space. He rose to prominence alongside his brother, John Green, with the creation of the YouTube channel Vlogbrothers in 2007. That channel helped launch the modern era of "edutainment" on YouTube, blending humor, science, and social commentary.

Over the years, Hank Green has co-founded several major educational channels, including Crash Course and SciShow. He has also written a number of successful novels, including "An Absolutely Remarkable Thing" and its sequel, "A Beautifully Foolish Endeavor." His work has earned him millions of fans and a reputation for thoughtful, engaging content.

Given his status, the AI controversy is significant. It shows that even creators who are deeply embedded in internet culture can struggle with the temptations and pitfalls of new technology.

What's Next for Green?

In the wake of the backlash, Green announced that he will pause or reduce the frequency of his YouTube output. He said he wants to do more work like a recent meditative video "where the writing was the whole thing and I felt it all the way down." That video, which was praised by fans, appears to represent the kind of intentional, human-crafted content Green wants to create going forward.

He also mentioned that he will probably make more videos featuring his "dumb unscripted straight to camera thoughts." This shift suggests a return to the raw, unpolished style that originally made him popular, rather than highly produced scripts that might rely on AI assistance.

"But mostly I need to come to terms with the fact that the level of dopamine I've been getting from interacting with LLMs…with doing more and more and more and more…is not healthy for me or good for the world," Green reiterated. "It is careless, and has disconnected me from where people are on this."

Broader Implications for Creators

Green's situation is a cautionary tale for the creator economy. Many YouTubers, podcasters, and writers are experimenting with generative AI to increase efficiency. However, as Green learned, audiences are quick to detect when something feels off. Authenticity is the currency of online influence, and any perceived reliance on AI can undermine trust.

The incident also raises questions about transparency. Should creators disclose when they use AI in their work? Some argue that full disclosure is necessary to maintain honesty with audiences. Others believe that AI is just another tool, and that the final output matters more than the process. Green's own position seems to be evolving. He acknowledged that his process had become so fast that even he wasn't sure where AI ended and his own thoughts began.

That self-awareness is rare. It suggests that Green is not just performing damage control, but actually reflecting on how technology is changing his relationship to his own creativity.

A Changing Landscape

The broader entertainment industry is also grappling with these issues. Hollywood writers went on strike in 2023 partly over concerns about AI's role in scriptwriting. Visual artists have seen their styles imitated by AI generators without consent. Musicians are discovering AI covers and songs that mimic their voices.

In the YouTube world, AI-generated videos have exploded in recent years. Some creators have turned to AI to produce content with minimal human effort, often flooding platforms with low-quality or misleading videos. The platform has had to update its policies around synthetic media and AI disclosure.

Green's apology comes at a critical moment. As AI tools become more powerful and accessible, every creator will have to decide where to draw the line. Green's decision to slow down and prioritize his own human voice, even at the cost of reduced output, may serve as an example for others.

It remains to be seen how he will implement these changes. He did not provide a specific timeline or a detailed plan for going forward. But the fact that he is publicly grappling with these questions, and acknowledging the downsides of his behavior, is a meaningful step.

As he said, the dopamine rush of constant creation and AI interaction is "not healthy" and has disconnected him from his community. By stepping back, he hopes to reconnect with what made his work meaningful in the first place.

Whether other creators will follow his lead is uncertain. But the conversation has been started, and Green's experience is now part of it.

Source: TechCrunch News

The announcement puts Valar at the forefront of a wave of investment in advanced nuclear energy, particularly small modular reactors (SMRs), which are designed to be cheaper, faster, and more flexible than traditional nuclear power plants. Valar’s founder and CEO Isaiah Taylor said the new funding will allow the company to move from building individual reactors to manufacturing fleets of SMRs, a critical step toward commercial scalability.

What Valar Atomics Is Building

Valar is focused on developing small modular nuclear reactors, which are factory-built power plants that can be transported and assembled on-site. These reactors are intended to provide reliable, carbon-free electricity at a smaller scale than conventional reactors, making them suitable for a variety of applications, including powering large data centers, industrial facilities, and even remote communities. The company’s flagship Ward 250 reactor is designed to produce 250 megawatts of thermal energy, with an electrical output that can be tailored to customer needs.

In June, Valar demonstrated that its Ward 250 reactor successfully powered an Nvidia Blackwell system, a high-performance computing platform used for AI workloads. The company also announced a deal with Nvidia to develop a waterless 30MW AI factory, a project that underscores the growing demand for clean, always-on power in the artificial intelligence sector. AI data centers consume enormous amounts of electricity, and nuclear energy is increasingly seen as a viable solution to meet that demand without carbon emissions.

The Road to Manufacturing Scale

Valar’s approach is unusual in the nuclear industry because it emphasizes iterative learning through rapid prototyping and data collection. The company says its reactors generate engineering, manufacturing, and operational data that are used to improve next-generation designs. According to Valar, the NOVA core took two years to complete, while the Ward 250 reached criticality in just seven months. The company believes that each subsequent reactor will be faster to build and cheaper to deploy, ultimately enabling production of tens, then hundreds, then thousands of reactors per year.

“With each reactor built, the tick rate will become smaller until Valar is producing tens, then hundreds, then thousands of reactors per year,” the company said in a statement. That ambition is central to Valar’s manufacturing strategy, which aims to apply lessons from the automotive and semiconductor industries to nuclear reactor production. By standardizing designs and building reactors in centralized factories, Valar hopes to cut construction times dramatically and reduce the cost of nuclear power to a level competitive with fossil fuels.

The Broader Nuclear Startup Landscape

Valar is not alone in pursuing this vision. The nuclear energy sector has seen a surge of private investment over the past few years, driven by concerns about climate change, energy security, and the rising electricity demands of AI and data centers. Several other startups have raised significant funding recently, including Antares, which secured $470 million, and X-energy, which raised $1 billion through its initial public offering. These companies are racing to bring SMRs to market, though regulatory hurdles and technical challenges remain significant.

Small modular reactors offer several advantages over traditional nuclear plants. They are smaller, so they can be sited in more locations and deployed incrementally as demand grows. Their modular design means they can be manufactured in a factory and assembled on-site, reducing the risk of cost overruns and delays that have plagued large-scale construction projects. In addition, SMRs are often designed with advanced safety features, such as passive cooling systems that do not require human intervention or external power to shut down safely.

However, the industry still faces obstacles. Regulatory approval is a lengthy and uncertain process, and the first generation of SMRs will need to demonstrate that they can operate reliably and economically over many years. There are also concerns about nuclear waste, though many SMR designs produce less waste per unit of energy than conventional reactors. Despite these challenges, investors are betting that the combination of technological innovation and growing demand for clean energy will make SMRs a major part of the global energy mix.

Investors and Strategic Backing

The $1 billion round was led by Sequoia, one of the most prominent venture capital firms in the world, known for backing companies such as Apple, Google, and Nvidia. Shaun Maguire, a partner at Sequoia who focuses on climate and energy technologies, will join Valar’s board. His involvement signals a strong vote of confidence in Valar’s technology and its ability to execute on its manufacturing vision.

Other investors in the round include Apandion Capital, Atreides Management, Conviction, Dream Ventures, HOF Capital, Point72, Riot Ventures, Snowpoint Ventures, and Valor Equity Partners. The breadth of the investor list reflects growing interest from both traditional venture capital firms and specialized energy investors in the nuclear sector. The $200 million line of credit from Erebor and other banks provides additional financial flexibility, allowing Valar to invest in manufacturing capacity and long-lead-time equipment without diluting existing shareholders further.

Implications for AI and Data Centers

One of the key drivers of Valar’s growth is the explosive demand for electricity from artificial intelligence workloads. AI models require vast amounts of computing power, and the data centers that house those systems consume large amounts of electricity. According to industry estimates, data centers could account for a significant share of global electricity demand in the coming decades. Many tech companies are exploring ways to power their operations with clean energy, and nuclear power is an attractive option because it can provide steady, uninterrupted electricity regardless of weather conditions.

Valar’s partnership with Nvidia is a clear example of how nuclear startups are aligning themselves with the AI industry. Nvidia is the leading manufacturer of AI processors, and its Blackwell architecture is designed for the most demanding computing tasks. By powering a Blackwell system with the Ward 250 reactor, Valar has demonstrated that its technology can meet the stringent power and reliability requirements of advanced AI infrastructure. The planned waterless 30MW AI factory would be particularly attractive for data center operators in arid regions, where water cooling is problematic.

The development of SMRs for AI applications is still in its early stages, but the potential market is enormous. If Valar can successfully deploy its reactors at scale, it could become a key supplier to the tech industry, providing a clean and reliable power source that allows data centers to operate around the clock. This could also help ease concerns about the grid impact of new data centers, which often face pushback from local utilities and communities worried about power availability and environmental effects.

Challenges and Path Forward

Despite the enthusiasm surrounding Valar, the road to commercialization is long and risky. The company will need to navigate the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s licensing process, which can take years but has been streamlined for SMRs in recent legislation. It will also need to secure customers beyond Nvidia and build a supply chain for the specialized materials and components required for its reactors. Manufacturing thousands of reactors per year is an ambitious goal that would require unprecedented scaling in a heavily regulated industry, and it remains to be seen whether Valar can achieve the cost reductions it envisions.

The company’s leadership has experience in both nuclear engineering and venture-backed startups, which may help it overcome these hurdles. Isaiah Taylor, the founder and CEO, has been described as a visionary who is determined to reinvent nuclear power for the 21st century. The injection of $1 billion in equity gives Valar a substantial runway to develop its technology, but it also raises expectations, and the company will be under pressure to deliver measurable progress in the coming years.

Valar’s announcement is the latest sign that nuclear energy is undergoing a renaissance, fueled by technological advances and the urgent need to decarbonize the global economy. While it is still unclear which reactor designs will succeed commercially, the sheer amount of capital flowing into the sector suggests that investors believe nuclear power will play a central role in the future energy landscape. For Valar, the challenge now is to prove that its reactors can be manufactured at scale and operated safely and cost-effectively, a task that will define the company’s long-term impact.

Source: TechCrunch News

Artificial intelligence continues to be a major factor in many of these decisions. A growing number of employers have said they are using AI to automate support, back-office, and content-production tasks. In some cases, layoffs are tied to strategic shifts toward AI products; in others, pandemic-era hiring has been unwound as growth slows. The following month-by-month tracker lists confirmed reductions and shutdowns reported throughout 2025. It will be updated as new information becomes available.

January 2025

The year opened with a mix of shutdowns, targeted reductions, and early signals that AI would drive workforce decisions.

Cushion

Fintech startup Cushion shut down, with CEO Paul Kesserwani announcing the closure on LinkedIn. The company's post-money valuation was $82.4 million in 2022.

Placer.ai

Placer.ai laid off 150 employees based in the U.S., affecting roughly 18% of its total workforce, in an effort to reach profitability.

Amazon

Amazon cut dozens of workers in its communications department, saying the company needed to move faster, increase ownership, strengthen its culture, and bring teams closer to customers.

Stripe

Stripe laid off 300 people, according to a leaked memo reported by Business Insider. The fintech giant also planned to grow its total headcount by 17% after the cuts.

Textio

Textio laid off 15 employees as the augmented writing startup underwent a restructuring effort.

Pocket FM

Pocket FM cut 75 employees to ensure the long-term sustainability and success of the company. The audio platform had previously cut 200 writers in July 2024.

Aurora Solar

Aurora Solar planned to cut 58 employees in response to ongoing macroeconomic challenges and continued uncertainty in the solar industry.

Meta

Meta announced an internal memo that it would cut 5% of staff targeting low performers as the company prepared for an intense year. The company had more than 72,000 employees at the time.

Wayfair

Wayfair cut up to 730 jobs, affecting 3% of its total workforce, as it planned to exit operations in Germany and focus on physical retailers.

Pandion

Pandion shut down operations, affecting 63 employees. Employees were paid through January 15 without severance.

Icon

Icon laid off 114 employees as part of a team realignment, focusing on its robotic printing system.

Altruist

Altruist eliminated 37 jobs, affecting roughly 10% of its total workforce, even as the company pursued aggressive hiring.

Aqua Security

Aqua Security cut dozens of employees across its global markets as part of a strategic reorganization to increase profitability.

SolarEdge Technologies

SolarEdge planned to lay off 400 employees globally in its fourth layoff round since January 2024 as the solar industry faced a downturn.

Level

Fintech startup Level, founded in 2018, abruptly shut down after an unsuccessful attempt to find a buyer. CEO Paul Aaron said Employer.com had a new offer under consideration to acquire the company post-shutdown.

February 2025

February became one of the largest months for tech layoffs in the year, with major companies cutting thousands of roles.

HP

HP cut up to 2,000 jobs as part of its Future Now restructuring plan, with the goal of saving $300 million before the end of its fiscal year.

GrubHub

GrubHub announced 500 job cuts after being sold to Wonder Group for $650 million. The reduction affected more than 20% of its previous workforce.

Autodesk

Autodesk planned to lay off 1,350 employees, affecting 9% of its workforce, as it reshaped its go-to-market model.

Google

Google cut employees in its People Operations and cloud organizations teams as part of a reorganization. The company offered a voluntary exit program to U.S.-based People Operations employees.

Nautilus

Nautilus reduced headcount by 25 employees, accounting for 16% of its workforce, while preparing a commercial version of its proteome analysis platform for 2026.

eBay

eBay cut a few dozen employees in Israel, potentially affecting 10% of its 250-person workforce in the country.

Starbucks

Starbucks cut 1,100 jobs in a reorganizing effort that affected its tech workers. The coffee chain said it would outsource some tech work to third-party employees.

Commercetools

Commercetools laid off dozens of employees after failing to meet sales growth targets, including around 10% of staff in one day. The headless commerce platform had raised money at a $1.9 billion valuation a few years earlier.

Dayforce

Dayforce cut roughly 5% of its current workforce in an efficiency drive to increase profitability and growth.

Expedia

Expedia laid off more employees in a cost-cutting effort. The travel giant had cut about 1,500 roles in its Product and Technology division the previous year.

Skybox Security

Skybox Security ceased operations and laid off employees after selling its business and technology to Israeli cybersecurity company Tufin. The cuts affected roughly 300 people.

HerMD

HerMD shut down operations after shifting from a brick-and-mortar model to a fully virtual women's healthcare provider. The startup raised $18 million in 2023 and said recent layoffs were tied to its former in-person business.

Zendesk

Zendesk cut 51 jobs at its San Francisco headquarters, according to state filings.

Vendease

Vendease cut 120 employees, affecting 44% of its total staff. It was the Y Combinator-backed Nigerian startup's second layoff round in five months.

Logically

Logically laid off dozens of employees as part of a cost-cutting effort to ensure long-term success in its mission to curb misinformation online.

Blue Origin

Blue Origin laid off about 10% of its workforce, affecting more than 1,000 employees. The cuts largely impacted engineering and program management positions.

Redfin

Redfin cut around 450 positions between February and July 2025, with a full restructuring set to be completed in the fall following its partnership with Zillow.

Sophos

Sophos laid off 6% of its total workforce. The cuts came less than two weeks after the cybersecurity firm acquired Secureworks for $859 million.

Zepz

Zepz cut nearly 200 employees and closed its operations in Poland and Kenya.

Unity

Unity conducted another round of layoffs; the number of affected employees was not disclosed.

JustWorks

JustWorks cut nearly 200 employees. CEO Mike Seckler cited potential adverse events like a recession or rising interest rates.

Bird

Bird cut 120 jobs, affecting roughly one-third of its workforce. The move came a year after the Dutch startup cut 90 employees following a rebrand.

Sprinklr

Sprinklr laid off about 500 employees, affecting 15% of its workforce, citing poor business performance. The cuts followed two earlier rounds that affected roughly 200 employees.

Sonos

Sonos let go of approximately 200 employees, according to reports. The company had previously cut 100 employees in August 2024.

Workday

Workday laid off 1,750 employees, affecting roughly 8.5% of the enterprise HR platform's total headcount.

Okta

Okta laid off 180 employees, just over a year after cutting 400 workers.

Cruise

Cruise laid off 50% of its workforce, including CEO Marc Whitten and several other top executives, as it prepared to shut down operations. The remaining autonomous vehicle operations moved under General Motors.

Salesforce

Salesforce eliminated more than 1,000 jobs while also recruiting workers to sell new AI products.

March 2025

March brought some of the largest single-company reductions of the year, including a bankruptcy-driven cut and a major industrial restructuring.

Northvolt

Northvolt laid off 2,800 employees, affecting 62% of its total staff. The layoffs came weeks after the Swedish battery maker filed for bankruptcy.

Block

Block let go of 931 employees, around 8% of its workforce, as part of a reorganization. CEO Jack Dorsey said the layoffs were not for financial reasons or to replace workers with AI.

Brightcove

Brightcove laid off 198 employees, about two-thirds of its U.S. workforce, a month after being acquired by Bending Spoons for $233 million.

Acxiom

Acxiom laid off 130 employees, or 3.5% of its workforce. The news came just after IPG and Omnicom shareholders approved a potential merger.

Sequoia Capital

Sequoia Capital closed its Washington, D.C. office and let go of its policy team. Three full-time employees were expected to be affected.

Siemens

Siemens planned to let go of approximately 5,600 jobs globally in its automation and electric-vehicle charging businesses.

HelloFresh

HelloFresh laid off 273 employees, closed its distribution center in Grand Prairie, Texas, and consolidated operations in Irving.

Otorio

Otorio cut 45 employees, more than half of its workforce, after being acquired by cybersecurity company Armis for $120 million.

ActiveFence

ActiveFence reduced 22 employees, representing 7% of its workforce. Most affected employees were based in Israel.

D-ID

D-ID cut 22 jobs, affecting nearly a quarter of its workforce, following a strategic partnership with Microsoft.

NASA

NASA shut down several offices in accordance with Elon Musk's DOGE, including its Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy and the DEI branch.

Zonar Systems

Zonar Systems laid off some staff, according to social media posts from former employees, but the company did not confirm the number.

Wayfair

Wayfair announced plans to let go of 340 employees in its technology division as part of a restructuring effort.

HPE

HPE cut 2,500 employees, or 5% of its staff, after its shares slid 19% in the first fiscal quarter.

TikTok

TikTok cut up to 300 workers in Dublin, accounting for roughly 10% of its workforce in Ireland.

LiveRamp

LiveRamp laid off 65 employees, affecting 5% of its total workforce.

Ola Electric

Ola Electric laid off over 1,000 employees and contractors in a cost-cutting effort, its second round in five months.

Rec Room

Rec Room reduced total headcount by 16% as the gaming startup shifted toward being scrappier and more efficient.

ANS Commerce

ANS Commerce was shut down three years after being acquired by Flipkart. The number of employees affected was not disclosed.

April 2025

April saw massive cuts at Intel, widespread reductions across startups, and continued layoffs at major platforms.

NetApp

NetApp eliminated 700 jobs, affecting 6% of its workforce, as part of an operational efficiency reorganization.

Electronic Arts

Electronic Arts let go of approximately 300 to 400 employees, including about 100 at Respawn Entertainment, to focus on long-term strategic priorities.

Expedia

Expedia laid off around 3% of its employees, mainly in midlevel product and technology roles. The cuts followed the departure of hundreds of global marketing staff in March.

Cars24

Cars24 reduced its workforce by about 200 employees in product and technology divisions as part of a restructuring.

Meta

Meta let go of over 100 employees in its Reality Labs division, affecting teams working on VR experiences and hardware operations.

Intel

Intel announced plans to lay off more than 21,000 employees, roughly 20% of its workforce, ahead of its Q1 earnings call under newly appointed CEO Lip-Bu Tan.

GM

GM laid off 200 people at its Factory Zero facility in Detroit and Hamtramck, Michigan, which produces electric vehicles.

Zopper

Zopper let go of around 100 employees since the start of 2025, with about 50 in tech and product roles in the latest round.

Turo

Turo reduced its workforce by 150 positions after deciding not to proceed with its IPO.

GupShup

GupShup laid off roughly 200 employees to improve efficiency and profitability, its second round in five months after cutting about 300 in December.

Forto

Forto eliminated 200 jobs, affecting about one-third of its employees, including a significant number of sales staff.

Wicresoft

Wicresoft stopped operations in China, affecting around 2,000 employees, after Microsoft decided to end outsourced after-sales support amid trade tensions.

Five9

Five9 cut 123 jobs, affecting about 4% of its workforce, as it prioritized artificial intelligence for profitable growth.

Google

Google laid off hundreds of employees in its platforms and devices division, covering Android, Pixel, Chrome, and related products.

Microsoft

Microsoft considered additional layoffs by May, reportedly discussing reductions in middle management and non-coder roles to increase the ratio of programmers to product managers.

Automattic

Automattic laid off 16% of its workforce across departments. With 1,744 employees before the cuts, more than 270 staff may have been affected.

Canva

Canva let go of 10 to 12 technical writers, about nine months after telling employees to use generative AI tools wherever possible.

May 2025

May included major reductions at Microsoft and several AI-affected education and cybersecurity companies.

Hims and Hers

Hims and Hers downsized by 68 employees, about 4% of total staff. The company said the layoffs were unrelated to a U.S. ban on producing large quantities of Wegovy.

Amazon

Amazon laid off around 100 employees from its devices and services division, which includes Alexa, Echo, Ring, and Zoox.

Microsoft

Microsoft cut over 6,500 jobs, affecting 3% of its worldwide workforce. It was one of the company's biggest layoffs since 2023.

Chegg

Chegg let go of 248 employees, about 22% of its workforce, as students turned to AI tools instead of traditional edtech platforms.

Match

Match reduced its workforce by 13% as part of a reorganization to cut costs and streamline operations.

CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike laid off 5% of its global workforce, around 500 people, as part of a strategic plan to scale efficiently toward $10 billion in ending annual recurring revenue.

General Fusion

General Fusion cut roughly 25% of its workforce. The Vancouver-based fusion energy company had raised $440 million from investors including Jeff Bezos.

Deep Instinct

Deep Instinct reduced headcount by 20 employees, accounting for 10% of its workforce.

Beam

Beam shut down operations and let go of approximately 200 employees, months after announcing major expansion plans.

June 2025

June was relatively quieter, but several companies still made significant cuts.

TomTom

TomTom cut 300 jobs, or 10% of its workforce, as part of an organizational restructuring in its sales and support divisions amid the AI shift.

Rivian

Rivian reduced headcount by approximately 140 employees, mostly in its manufacturing team.

Bumble

Bumble cut approximately 240 jobs, or 30% of its workforce, to save $40 million annually and invest in new products.

Klue

Klue laid off 85 employees, about 40% of its workforce. The Vancouver-based startup sells AI-powered competitive intelligence software.

Google

Google downsized its smart TV division by 25% of its 300-member team and cut funding for Google TV and Android TV by 10%, while increasing AI investment.

Intel

Intel planned to lay off 15% to 20% of workers in its Intel Foundry division starting in July, and confirmed it would wind down its auto business.

Playtika

Playtika let go of around 90 employees, with 40 in Israel and 50 in Poland, after cutting 50 employees a few weeks earlier.

Airtime

Airtime let go of about 25 employees from its 58-person team. The video startup was launched by Evernote founder Phil Libin in 2020.

Microsoft

Microsoft laid off more employees, affecting software engineers, product managers, technical program managers, marketers, and legal counsel, after cutting over 6,500 in May.

July 2025

July saw large cuts at Microsoft, Intel, and several AI-adjacent startups.

Atlassian

Atlassian cut 150 roles in customer service and support, saying improvements to its platform had significantly reduced support needs.

Consensys

Consensys cut about 7% of its workforce, or 47 employees, as part of a push toward profitability. The company continued hiring for select roles.

Zeen

Zeen shut down operations. The social collaging platform aimed at creators was founded in 2019 and raised $9 million.

Scale AI

Scale AI laid off around 200 employees, about 14% of its workforce, and cut ties with 500 global contractors, weeks after Meta brought in the company's CEO in a $14.3 billion deal.

Lenovo

Lenovo cut more than 100 U.S. full-time jobs, about 3% of its workforce, including positions at its Morrisville, North Carolina campus.

Intel

Intel reportedly planned to lay off nearly 2,400 workers in Oregon, about five times more than previously announced.

Indeed and Glassdoor

Indeed and Glassdoor eliminated approximately 1,300 jobs combined, mostly in the U.S., as part of a restructuring to focus on AI.

Eigen Lab

Eigen Lab laid off 29 employees, about 25% of its workforce, as part of a reorganization after launching EigenCloud.

Microsoft

Microsoft cut 9,000 employees, less than 4% of its global workforce, following earlier cuts in January, May, and June.

ByteDance

ByteDance laid off 65 employees in Bellevue, Washington, as the TikTok parent continued restructuring.

August 2025

August brought layoffs at Oracle, Cisco, and several companies tied to AI and marketing technology.

Cisco

Cisco eliminated 221 positions across Milpitas and San Francisco, as part of a broader workforce reduction.

Restaurant365

Restaurant365 laid off about 100 employees, around 9% of its workforce, after falling short of growth targets.

Oracle

Oracle cut 101 jobs in Santa Clara, with terminations effective October 13, following nearly 200 layoffs at Pleasanton and Redwood City and plans for 161 cuts in Seattle.

F5

F5 cut 106 positions at its Seattle and Liberty Lake, Washington offices, affecting senior engineers and managers.

Peloton

Peloton cut 6% of its workforce in its sixth layoff in just over a year, citing the need to improve long-term business health.

Kaltura

Kaltura cut 10% of its workforce, about 70 employees, to save $8.5 million in operating expenses.

Yotpo

Yotpo laid off about

Source: TechCrunch News

The announcement sent ripples through the pop community, which has long speculated about a formal studio pairing between these two chart-topping legends. While both artists have shared festival bills and mutual admiration for decades, the WorldPride performance marked the first time they shared a stage for a duet. Now, with the "Afterhours Mix" on the horizon, that fleeting live moment will be immortalized in a polished, club-ready form.

A Weekend to Remember

The collaboration first came to life on Saturday night (Aug. 1) when Minogue made a surprise appearance during Madonna's headline set at Club Confessions, the exclusive WorldPride Amsterdam event. The crowd erupted as Minogue emerged from the wings, dressed in a royal purple ensemble that mirrored Madonna's own vibrant outfit. Together, they delivered a high-octane rendition of "Love Sensation," a track from Madonna's Confessions II sessions that has become a beloved favorite in her recent live shows.

The performance was all the more special for the palpable chemistry between the two superstars. Eyewitnesses described a mutual respect and joy as they traded verses and moved in sync on stage. The audience, a mix of devoted fans from both camps, sang along to every word, creating an atmosphere that felt both nostalgic and freshly thrilling. It was a moment that social media quickly amplified, with clips of the duet trending worldwide within minutes.

The Remix Details

The upcoming "Afterhours Mix" is produced by Stuart Price, the acclaimed British producer who has worked extensively with both Madonna and Minogue over the years. Price co-produced the original studio version of "Love Sensation" alongside Madonna, and his involvement has raised expectations for a nuanced, dance-floor-ready interpretation. The new mix is expected to expand the track's atmospheric and late-night textures, staying true to its "Afterhours" title while retaining the euphoric energy of the live performance.

Notably, Minogue does not appear on the original studio version of "Love Sensation." The upcoming remix, however, clearly credits both artists, signifying a true duet. This marks Minogue's first official studio collaboration with Madonna, a landmark moment for fans who have waited decades for such a pairing. The remix will be available across all major streaming platforms on Friday.

A Long-Awaited Meeting of Icons

The cultural weight of this collaboration cannot be overstated. Madonna and Kylie Minogue have each been global pop fixtures for more than four decades, carving out parallel yet distinct paths to superstardom. Madonna emerged from the New York dance underground in the early 1980s, redefining pop music, fashion, and music videos with every release. Minogue, an Australian soap opera actress turned chart-topping singer, found international fame in the late '80s with "I Should Be So Lucky" and evolved into a beloved global icon known for her resilience and reinvention.

While they have crossed paths at award shows and industry events for years, they have rarely performed together. In fact, their WorldPride duet was the first time the two shared a stage for a full song. Fans have long dreamt of a joint project, and the announcement of the "Afterhours Mix" has finally made that dream a reality. The excitement is particularly intense among the LGBTQ+ community, for whom both Madonna and Minogue have long served as powerful allies and symbols of self-expression.

Stuart Price's Signature Touch

Stuart Price's involvement adds another layer of significance. Price first collaborated with Madonna as the co-writer and co-producer of her 2005 album Confessions on a Dance Floor, which included hits like "Hung Up" and "Sorry." He also served as the musical director for her Confessions and Sticky & Sweet tours. More recently, he worked on Madonna's 2025 album Confessions II, where "Love Sensation" originally appeared. Price is also a longtime collaborator of Minogue's, having remixed her work and produced songs on her albums. His ability to blend both artists' distinct sonic identities makes him the ideal choice for this ambitious remix.

The "Afterhours Mix" is expected to showcase Price's mastery of extended mixes, layering additional percussion, synth arpeggios, and expanded vocal sections. Fans anticipate a version that respects the original's disco-house foundations while introducing new melodic elements that allow Minogue's and Madonna's voices to complement each other. With Price at the helm, the remix is likely to be a highlight of the summer club season.

The Legacy of "Love Sensation"

"Love Sensation" first emerged as a standout track on Confessions II, Madonna's critically acclaimed sixth studio album released in November 2025. The album continued her deep exploration of dance music, blending nostalgia with forward-looking production. The track quickly became a fan favorite, and its subsequent rise to No. 1 on the dance airplay chart confirmed its resonance. The chart milestone, achieved on the same weekend as the WorldPride performance, seemed to foreshadow the duet announcement.

The song's title and themes — desire, unity, and euphoria — made it a natural fit for a pride celebration. The live rendition at WorldPride transformed it into an anthem of collective joy, with Madonna and Minogue embodying a spirit of solidarity and mutual admiration. The upcoming remix extends that message, inviting listeners to revisit a moment that transcended typical pop performances.

Social Media Frenzy

Both artists have been openly celebrating the collaboration. Madonna took to Instagram on Monday to share a carousel of images from her weekend with Minogue. The first photo shows the two singers clad in royal purple, leaning into each other in the backseat of a car, radiating camaraderie. Other slides capture them with Price, conferring backstage, and mid-performance, surrounded by lights and a roaring crowd. The caption read, "L🪩VE SENSATI🪩N @KylieMinogue Thanks for coming!! CLUB CONFESSIONS: AMSTERDAM 🩷❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜🤎," ending with a sweet backstage embrace.

Minogue also shared a montage video on her own Instagram, featuring her dramatic stage walk-out and footage of the performance. Her caption, "@madonna 🥹🥰😘 Thank you everyone at Club Confessions World Pride Amsterdam @heymistr @tschukraft @stuartpriceofficial," expressed genuine gratitude. The mutual affection on display has only amplified fan excitement for the studio release.

What This Means for Both Artists

For Madonna, the collaboration reinforces her position as a pop pioneer who continues to create culturally defining moments. It also solidifies her recent creative surge, following the success of Confessions II and a series of live events that have showcased her enduring showmanship. For Minogue, the joint release represents another high point in a remarkable late-career resurgence. Her recent albums have received critical acclaim, and this collaboration exposes her to a broader audience while honoring her legacy.

The "Afterhours Mix" also underscores the powerful relationship between pop music and LGBTQ+ culture. Both Madonna and Minogue have historically been champions of the community, and their decision to debut this collaboration at WorldPride surfaces as a meaningful gesture. It is a reminder that dance music has always been a safe haven and a source of empowerment for marginalized voices.

As fans eagerly await Friday's release, the track is already being hailed as one of the most significant pop duets in years. It brings together two artists whose combined discographies span hundreds of songs, millions of album sales, and countless tours. For the first time, those paths converge on a single recording that celebrates their shared affinity for dance music and their mutual respect.

The "Love Sensation (Afterhours Mix)" will be released on all streaming services on Friday, Aug. 7. Until then, fans can relive the WorldPride performance through the many videos circulating online, and speculate on whether this is the beginning of a more extended creative partnership. Given the enthusiasm from both camps, it would be unsurprising if "Love Sensation" becomes the first of several collaborations between these two enduring icons. The summer of 2026 just got a whole lot more danceable.

Source: MSN News

Sunak entered Downing Street in October 2022 with a reputation for competence. He had been a popular chancellor during the pandemic, known for rolling out a massive jobs retention scheme that shielded millions of workers from the economic shock of COVID-19. He was seen as the stable, safe pair of hands needed to restore credibility after the disastrous 49-day premiership of Liz Truss, whose unfunded tax cuts sent financial markets into turmoil. Yet the campaign has revealed a politician who struggles to connect with ordinary voters and who often appears out of step with the mood of the country.

A series of self-inflicted wounds

The most damaging moment of the campaign came on June 6, when Sunak left the 80th anniversary D-Day commemorations in Normandy early to return to Britain. He skipped the international ceremony that brought together President Joe Biden, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Keir Starmer, the Labour leader who is now the clear favourite to replace him as prime minister. Sunak later apologised, calling his decision a mistake, but the political fallout was immediate and severe.

Critics said that leaving the event early, especially on such a solemn anniversary, showed disrespect to the veterans who fought and died in the Second World War. The episode also allowed Starmer to look statesmanlike, standing alongside other world leaders while the British prime minister was not there. For a conservative leader who often invokes patriotism and national pride, it was a particularly painful error. Political analysts noted that the image of Sunak missing the ceremony reinforced his problem of appearing out of touch and unable to perform on the national stage when it matters most.

The D-Day misstep was not an isolated incident. Sunak's campaign has also been overshadowed by a gambling scandal within his own party. Several Conservative candidates and officials were accused of placing bets on the timing of the election before the date was publicly announced. Sunak initially resisted calls to act, but he eventually suspended the candidates involved, a week after Starmer pressed him to do so. The delay gave the impression that the prime minister was not in full control of his party and that he only responded under pressure.

Polling pain for the Conservatives

Throughout the campaign, opinion polls have consistently given Labour a double-digit lead over the Conservatives. If those numbers are borne out on election day, Labour would return to power for the first time since 2010, and the Conservatives would face one of their worst defeats in modern history. The last time the party lost a general election was in 1997, when Tony Blair led Labour to a landslide victory over John Major.

The roots of the Conservatives' current predicament go back further than Sunak's campaign struggles. Boris Johnson was forced to resign as prime minister in 2022 after being found to have misled Parliament about parties held in Downing Street during coronavirus lockdowns. That scandal severely damaged public trust in the Conservative Party. Then Liz Truss's brief premiership destroyed the party's reputation for economic competence. Her plan for sweeping unfunded tax cuts caused the pound to crash, sent government borrowing costs soaring and forced the Bank of England to intervene in the bond market. Truss lasted only 49 days, but the damage to the Conservative brand was lasting.

Sunak took over with a promise to restore stability, and he did calm the markets. But he has been unable to repair the party's image with voters. His 20 months in office have been marked by internal Conservative divisions over immigration, tax and the future direction of the party. One wing of the party wants harsher immigration policies and deeper tax cuts, while another pushes for a more centrist approach. Sunak has struggled to satisfy either side, and his campaign has failed to move public opinion in his favour.

Rob Ford, a political scientist at the University of Manchester, observed that the Conservatives badly needed to boost Sunak's approval ratings. Instead, he said, the clumsy and error-strewn campaign has simply reinforced the party's weakness. Voters who were already inclined to distrust the government have seen little reason to change their minds.

From chancellor to campaigner

Sunak's political career has been remarkable by any measure. Born in 1980 in Southampton to parents of Indian descent, he was educated at Winchester College, one of Britain's most expensive private schools, before studying politics, philosophy and economics at Oxford University. He later earned an MBA at Stanford University as a Fulbright scholar, where he met his wife, Akshata Murty, the daughter of Indian billionaire Narayana Murthy, founder of the IT giant Infosys. Sunak went on to work for Goldman Sachs and later became a hedge fund manager before entering politics.

He was elected to Parliament in 2015 for the safe Conservative seat of Richmond in Yorkshire. In 2016 he backed Brexit, and after the Leave victory he rose quickly through the party ranks. In February 2020, as the coronavirus pandemic was about to hit Britain, he was unexpectedly appointed chancellor of the exchequer. Within weeks he had unveiled one of the largest economic rescue packages in British history, including the furlough scheme that paid the wages of millions of workers. His calm, polished television performances during the pandemic earned him the nickname Dishy Rishi and made him one of the most popular figures in the government.

But that popularity did not survive the broader Conservative collapse. Sunak also faced criticism over his personal wealth. The Sunday Times's 2024 Rich List estimated that he and his wife had a fortune of around 651 million pounds, more than King Charles III. Labour leader Starmer and other opponents have used this to argue that Sunak is out of touch with the everyday struggles of working people.

His defenders point out that he warned Conservative members about Truss's reckless economic plan during the leadership contest to replace Johnson. He has reminded voters of that warning on the campaign trail, saying, I was right then, when I warned about Liz Truss. That is why all of you can trust me now. He has also highlighted his record as chancellor, arguing that he understands how to run the economy and keep taxes down.

Struggling with the political touch

However, the campaign has not given Sunak the chance to reset the narrative. He often appears stiff in public, and his attempts to engage with voters have sometimes backfired. In one awkward moment, he asked workers at a factory whether they had tried to get on a plane during the pandemic, a comment that seemed to ignore the reality of lockdown restrictions. He has also been accused of delivering policy announcements that are muddled or lacking in detail.

Sunak is not used to losing. His political career has been one of unexpected success and rapid advancement. At 44, he is the youngest prime minister Britain has had in more than 200 years, and the first Hindu to hold the office. He has achieved more in politics than most people ever will. But the July 4 election now looks set to define him in a very different way. Unless he can produce a miraculous turnaround in the final days of the campaign, he will likely become the Conservative leader who lost power after 14 years of Tory rule.

The final stretch of the campaign may not change the outcome. Sunak's team insists that the polls are narrowing and that there is still a fight to be had, but most independent analysts see little sign of momentum. The prime minister's personal ratings remain weak, and the Conservative Party is still haunted by the controversies that drove its previous leaders from office.

For Sunak, the election has been a brutal lesson in the difference between governing and campaigning. He has shown that he can handle the details of policy and manage a crisis, but the intuitive ability to read the public mood has eluded him. His early departure from the D-Day ceremony, the betting scandal, and his difficulty in shaking off accusations of being out of touch have all contributed to a portrait of a politician who is working against his own party's history. As voters prepare to go to the polls, Sunak faces the very real prospect of becoming the leader who could not hold the Conservatives together. He has never been through a defeat like this, and he is not used to losing.

Source: KSAT News

What is Article 50?

Article 50 of the EU AI Act is specifically dedicated to transparency obligations. While many provisions of the AI Act focus on high-risk systems, Article 50 applies to a broader set of AI applications that pose risks related to deception, manipulation, or impersonation. The article establishes that certain AI systems must be designed and used in a way that ensures natural persons are informed that they are interacting with an AI system, unless this is obvious from the circumstances and context of use.

The obligations are not uniform; they vary depending on the type of AI system and the role of the entity involved. The European Commission has also published guidelines (though not legally binding) to help stakeholders understand and implement the requirements. The entry into force triggers a compliance deadline for most obligations, although some provisions have extended application periods.

Key Transparency Obligations

Article 50 introduces several distinct obligations, each targeting a specific use case:

1. AI Systems Intended to Interact with Natural Persons

The first obligation applies to AI systems that are designed to interact directly with people. This includes chatbots, voice assistants, and other conversational interfaces. Providers and deployers must ensure that users are informed that they are interacting with an AI system. The information must be provided in a clear and easily perceivable manner, appropriate to the context and the user's abilities. This requirement does not apply to AI systems that are legally required to detect, prevent, investigate, or prosecute criminal offenses, unless they are available for the public to report a crime.

2. Deepfakes and AI-Generated Content

Providers of AI systems that generate or manipulate image, audio, or video content that appreciably resembles existing persons, objects, places, or events and would falsely appear to be authentic (also known as deepfakes) must disclose that the content has been artificially generated or manipulated. Deployers of such systems must also ensure that the provenance of the content is clearly marked. Exceptions apply when the content is part of an obviously creative, artistic, satirical, fictional, or analogous work, provided the disclosure does not impede the display or enjoyment of the work.

3. AI Systems Generating Text for Public Information

Providers of AI systems that generate text intended for public information (e.g., news summaries, press releases, or public statements) must disclose that the text has been generated by an AI system. This obligation applies where the text is published or disseminated in the EU, but it does not apply when the content has undergone human review and editorial control.

Timeline and Phased Application

The entry into force of Article 50 is not the same for all provisions. The EU AI Act was published in the Official Journal on July 12, 2024, and entered into force twenty days later. However, most provisions became applicable on August 2, 2026, after a two-year transition period. Article 50, however, was among the first to become fully applicable—already on August 2, 2025. This early application reflects the EU's view that transparency is a foundational requirement that should not wait for the full regulatory framework to mature.

It is important to note that some obligations under Article 50 apply immediately, while others may have been applicable earlier or later depending on the specific system type. The European Commission has established a platform for information sharing and guidance, and the AI Office is responsible for overseeing implementation. The phased approach gives businesses a window to adapt their practices, but the clock is already ticking.

Who is Affected?

Article 50 casts a wide net. It applies to both providers—organizations that develop AI systems and place them on the market or put them into service—and deployers, which are entities that use AI systems in a professional capacity. This includes technology companies, media organizations, public authorities, and any business that uses AI to generate customer-facing content. Even developers of open-source AI models may in some cases fall under the transparency obligations, though the act provides some exemptions for non-commercial research and development.

The obligations are extraterritorial in scope. Any provider that places AI systems on the EU market, or any deployer based outside the EU whose AI outputs are used within the EU, must comply. This means that a company in the United States or Asia that develops a chatbot used by European customers will need to ensure the chatbot discloses its artificial nature. Non-compliance with Article 50 can result in substantial fines.

Enforcement and Penalties

The enforcement of Article 50 is the responsibility of national competent authorities in each EU member state. These authorities have the power to conduct market surveillance, request information, and impose penalties. The fines for violating transparency obligations are significant. For providers of non-high-risk AI systems, the maximum fine is €15 million or 3% of annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. For deployers, the fines are generally the same, though certain smaller operators may have reduced penalties. The exact amount depends on the gravity of the infringement, the size of the company, and other mitigating or aggravating factors.

In addition to fines, authorities can order the withdrawal of non-compliant AI systems from the market. The AI Office at the European Commission will also play a role in monitoring and coordinating enforcement, particularly for systemic risks. While Article 50 has no direct private right of action, individuals or organizations harmed by a lack of transparency may seek remedies under other EU laws, such as product liability or consumer protection rules.

Practical Steps for Compliance

Organizations that are subject to Article 50 should begin implementing compliance measures without delay. Here are several practical steps:

• Inventory AI systems: Identify all AI systems in development or in use that involve interaction with natural persons, deepfake generation, or public-facing text generation. Determine whether any exemptions apply.
• Update design and user interfaces: For chatbots and voice assistants, ensure that disclosure messages are visible, audible, or otherwise perceivable at the start of the interaction and at appropriate intervals. The disclosure should be in plain language and easily understandable.
• Label synthetic content: Implement watermarking, metadata tagging, or other detection mechanisms for AI-generated images, audio, video, and text. For deepfakes, ensure the label is prominent and cannot be easily removed or ignored.
• Maintain records: Keep detailed documentation of all transparency measures, including technical implementation and risk assessments. This will be essential for demonstrating compliance during inspections.
• Train staff: Educate employees who develop, deploy, or manage AI systems about their legal obligations and the importance of transparency. Ensure that any human oversight is properly documented.

Broader Context of the EU AI Act

Article 50 is just one piece of the EU AI Act, which is the world's first comprehensive legal framework for AI. The act adopts a risk-based approach, classifying AI systems into minimal, limited, high, and unacceptable risk categories. Transparency obligations fall under the limited risk category, though they extend to certain minimal risk applications as well. The act also establishes strict requirements for high-risk AI systems, which include areas like critical infrastructure, education, employment, biometric identification, and law enforcement. Providers of high-risk systems must conduct conformity assessments, implement risk management systems, ensure data quality, and comply with logging obligations.

The AI Act also creates a new institutional structure: the European Artificial Intelligence Board, which brings together national authorities, and the AI Office, which oversees the implementation and enforcement of the act. The act includes provisions for innovation-friendly measures, such as regulatory sandboxes and testing environments, to support startups and SMEs. Additionally, the act addresses general-purpose AI models, with specific obligations for providers of such models, including transparency for their capabilities and limitations.

The entry into force of Article 50 is a signal that the EU is serious about making AI trustworthy. By requiring clear disclosure, the EU hopes to empower individuals to make informed choices and to hold AI developers and users accountable. The transparency rules also complement other EU legislation, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the Digital Services Act (DSA), and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), creating a coherent digital rights framework.

International Implication

The EU's regulatory approach is being watched closely by other jurisdictions. The Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law, opened for signature in September 2024, echoes similar transparency principles. The United States, the United Kingdom, China, and other countries are developing their own AI governance frameworks, and many are looking to the EU AI Act as a reference. For multinational companies, complying with Article 50 may require establishing a global standard for transparency, even in markets where it is not yet mandated by law.

The first legal challenges and enforcement actions under Article 50 are expected soon. Questions are likely to arise about the boundaries of "appreciably resembles" for deepfakes, the meaning of "obvious from the circumstances" for interaction disclosure, and the scope of "public information" for text generation. Courts will need to interpret these terms, and the European Court of Justice will ultimately give definitive judgments. Until then, the European Commission's guidelines offer practical advice, though they are not binding.

For businesses, the arrival of Article 50 should be a catalyst for a careful review of their AI portfolio. Now is the time to build transparency into the design of AI products and services, not as an afterthought but as a core principle. Compliance will not only avoid penalties but also foster user trust, which is essential for long-term success. The EU AI Act is not just a regulatory hurdle; it is an opportunity to demonstrate ethical leadership in the age of artificial intelligence.

Source: AI News News

Drug discovery is a complex, multi-stage process that requires understanding how diseases arise, how proteins interact, how genes are regulated, and how the human body responds to chemical compounds. Traditional methods rely on hypothesis-driven experiments, which are time-consuming and expensive. AI offers a way to accelerate these processes by identifying patterns in large datasets that human researchers might miss. However, the entire AI pipeline depends on one fundamental input: data. Without accurate, comprehensive, and biologically meaningful data, even the most advanced algorithms will produce unreliable predictions.

The Data Problem in AI-Driven Drug Discovery

One of the biggest challenges in applying AI to drug discovery is the availability of high-quality biological data. Public databases contain vast amounts of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic information, but these datasets are often noisy, incomplete, or inconsistent. For example, gene expression data generated in different laboratories using different platforms can be difficult to compare. Clinical data is even more problematic, often suffering from irregular documentation, missing values, and variability in patient populations. When AI systems are trained on such imperfect data, the resulting models may perform well in controlled settings but fail to generalize to real-world clinical scenarios.

Biological data matters more than algorithmic changes because the limits of a predictive model are largely determined by the data it learns from. In machine learning, the concept of garbage in, garbage out remains fundamental. A model trained on biased or incomplete data will produce biased or incomplete predictions, regardless of how many layers its neural network has or how many GPU hours are devoted to training. In drug discovery, these errors can have serious consequences, from missed therapeutic targets to false predictions about drug toxicity. Therefore, the focus must shift from model architecture to data quality.

Key Facts: Why Biological Data Is the True Differentiator

• AI models are only as good as their training data. High-quality biological data enables models to learn meaningful patterns, while noisy data leads to misleading predictions.
• Biological data captures disease complexity. Diseases are not caused by single genes but by networks of interacting molecular pathways. Multi-omics data provides the full picture needed for AI to understand these interactions.
• Well-curated datasets improve model generalization. Models trained on diverse datasets from many populations are more likely to perform well in real-world clinical settings.
• Data integration is essential. Combining genomics, proteomics, clinical records, and imaging data gives AI systems the context needed to make accurate drug predictions.
• Data sharing accelerates innovation. Collaborative efforts that make biological datasets freely available allow researchers worldwide to build more robust AI models.

From Genes to Drugs: The Many Layers of Biological Data

Biological data relevant to drug discovery comes in many forms. Genomic data reveals mutations and genetic variants that contribute to disease. Transcriptomics measures gene expression levels, providing insight into which genes are active in specific tissues or disease states. Proteomics examines the proteins that are actually expressed and how they are modified, while metabolomics looks at the small molecules involved in cellular processes. Each layer offers a unique view of biology, and when integrated, these layers can provide a truly systems-level understanding of disease.

For AI to be useful in drug discovery, it must be able to handle this complexity. Consider a disease like cancer: tumors often have thousands of genetic mutations, but only a small number of them are driver mutations that promote cancer growth. AI models can help distinguish driver mutations from passengers, but only if they are trained on large, well-annotated datasets that include not only genomic sequences but also clinical outcomes, drug responses, and functional experiments. This kind of richly annotated data is rare, making those datasets that do exist enormously valuable.

Why Data Quality Outweighs Algorithm Innovation

The AI field is constantly producing new algorithms, architectures, and optimization techniques. Yet the gap between a mediocre model with excellent data and an excellent model with mediocre data is stark. In biomedical research, this principle is especially true. A model trained on thousands of carefully labeled patient samples can reliably predict which patients are likely to respond to a particular therapy. On the other hand, a state-of-the-art deep learning model trained on a handful of inconsistent cell-line experiments will likely produce meaningless results.

Furthermore, biological data is context-dependent. The same gene may have completely different effects in different tissues or under different environmental conditions. Sex, age, ancestry, and lifestyle all influence how drugs are metabolized and how diseases progress. To capture these variables, AI systems require data from diverse patient populations and experimental conditions. This diversity is not just an ethical afterthought; it is a scientific necessity. Models trained exclusively on data from one demographic group are likely to fail in others, leading to health disparities and unsafe treatments.

The Rise of Multi-Omics Data

One of the most promising trends in AI drug discovery is the move toward multi-omics data integration. Instead of analyzing a single biological layer, researchers are combining genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and epigenomic data to build comprehensive models of disease. This approach recognizes that biological systems are interconnected. A mutation in a gene may alter its expression, which in turn affects protein levels, which may disrupt metabolic pathways. AI models that capture these connections can identify drug targets more accurately and predict side effects earlier.

However, multi-omics integration also creates new challenges. Different omics datasets have different scales, noise levels, and missing data patterns. Combinatorial complexity grows rapidly as more layers are added. AI methods, particularly graph neural networks and transformer-based architectures, are being developed to model these interactions, but their success depends on the underlying data infrastructure. Standardized formats, rigorous quality control, and complete metadata are essential for making multi-omics datasets useful to AI systems.

Clinical Data and Real-World Evidence

Biological data extends beyond the laboratory into the clinic. Electronic health records, medical imaging data, and patient-reported outcomes provide crucial information about how drugs perform in real-world populations. These data are often messy, unstructured, and protected by strict privacy regulations, but they contain a wealth of knowledge about drug efficacy and safety. AI models that incorporate real-world evidence can identify rare adverse events, drug-drug interactions, and patient subgroups that may benefit from specific treatments.

However, clinical data must be linked to molecular data to unlock its full potential. A patient's response to a drug is determined not only by their clinical history but also by their genetic makeup and molecular profile. By combining clinical data with genomic and proteomic data, researchers can begin to explain why some patients respond to a treatment while others do not. This precision medicine approach is one of the most promising applications of AI in drug discovery, and it is only possible when high-quality biological data is available.

Data Curation and Standardization

The value of biological data is directly tied to its curation. Raw data from high-throughput experiments is full of technical artifacts, batch effects, and measurement errors. Without careful preprocessing and annotation, this noise can overwhelm the true biological signal. Data curation involves normalizing values, harmonizing variable names, removing duplicates, and integrating metadata that describes how and why the data was collected. This process is labor-intensive and often considered unglamorous, but it is essential for building AI models that are reliable and reproducible.

Standards are also critical. FAIR data principles, which require data to be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable, are becoming widely adopted in the biomedical community. When datasets adhere to common standards, they can be easily combined and compared, increasing the sample size available for training AI models. We need these standards to break down silos between research groups and enable large-scale collaboration.

The Future of AI Drug Discovery Depends on Data Ecosystems

As AI continues to evolve, the demand for high-quality biological data will only grow. Pharmaceutical companies, academic research centers, and technology companies are all racing to build proprietary datasets as competitive advantages. At the same time, public initiatives are working to make comprehensive datasets available to the entire research community. The tension between proprietary and open data is unlikely to disappear, but there is a growing recognition that data sharing can accelerate drug discovery and ultimately benefit patients.

In the coming years, advances in single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and organ-on-chip technologies will generate even more detailed biological data. These technologies will allow AI models to capture cellular heterogeneity and tissue architecture in ways that were impossible before. Yet these new data types will also require new methods of integration, visualization, and interpretation. The scientific community must invest not only in AI algorithms but also in the data infrastructure that supports them.

Biological data is not simply an input to AI drug discovery; it is the foundation upon which all AI-based predictions are built. Every successful model, every newly identified target, and every safe drug candidate begins with high-quality biological information. The companies and researchers that understand this principle and prioritize data acquisition, curation, and integration will be the ones that lead the next generation of medicine. The path from data to drug is long and complex, but with the right data in hand, AI can make that path shorter, safer, and more effective.

Source: AI News News

The announcement came as a surprise to many fans, as the group had been mostly dormant following a complicated legal battle with their label, ADOR, and its parent company HYBE. While no new music has been officially announced yet, the visual content strongly suggests that a comeback is imminent. The project’s title, “2026 Summer of NewJeans,” evokes the carefree, youthful energy that defined the group’s early hits such as “Attention,” “Hype Boy,” and “Ditto.”

Fourth Anniversary Celebration

NewJeans made their debut on July 22, 2022, with the surprise release of “Attention.” To celebrate their fourth anniversary, the members have come together for a commemorative special film series, as confirmed by HYBE’s global communications team. In a press release, the team stated that the series marks “the group’s first official content featuring the four members — MINJI, HANNI, HAERIN and HYEIN — together in two years since wrapping up their most recent album, Supernatural.”

ADOR also issued a statement expressing the heartfelt nature of the project. “The special film series was created from the members’ shared wish to celebrate their fourth anniversary together with fans. We hope Bunnies will enjoy these films as a heartfelt gift,” the label said. This sentiment was echoed across the group’s social media channels, where fans have been eagerly dissecting every frame for clues about future releases.

A Nostalgic Tribute to Bunnies

The newly released content is packed with references to NewJeans’ history and their devoted fanbase, known as Bunnies. In group and individual photos, the members appear surrounded by stuffed animals, origami creations, and other whimsical objects. Each member’s video features subtle winks to the fanbase, with little rabbits appearing throughout as the group’s representative animal. The rabbit motif has been central to NewJeans’ identity since their debut, appearing in their light sticks, album packaging, and music video imagery.

One recurring theme in the new content is an ice cream stand called “The Bunnies Scoop,” which is promoting a “New Flavor!” that “Tastes Like Summer!” The price listed at the stand is $7.22, a direct reference to the date of the group’s debut. On July 22, 2022, NewJeans surprised the world with their first song, “Attention,” which quickly became a global hit. The nod to this date is a meaningful way to honor the bond between the group and their fans.

In the solo video for youngest member Hyein, viewers see her drawing the same U-shaped character that appears atop NewJeans’ official light sticks. This character, often interpreted as a stylized bunny head, has become synonymous with the group. The attention to detail in these visuals demonstrates the members’ desire to reconnect with the elements that made their early work so beloved.

The final mini-film unveiled is a 59-second visual in which all four members happily reunite in person. A quick shot shows what appears to be a large white rabbit in the grass, catching their attention before the video ends. The clip is simple but emotionally resonant, suggesting that the group is ready to move forward together after a period of uncertainty.

First Group Activity Since Supernatural

NewJeans’ last release was Supernatural, which dropped on June 21, 2024. That project, a Japanese single, was accompanied by music videos and promotional activities that cemented NewJeans’ status as one of K-pop’s most exciting acts. However, the group’s momentum was disrupted by a highly publicized legal dispute with HYBE and ADOR. The conflict began in mid-2024, when all five members sought to terminate their exclusive contracts, alleging a breakdown of trust and working conditions. The subsequent legal proceedings dominated K-pop headlines for months.

During the dispute, NewJeans’ activities were largely put on hold. The group did not release new music or appear together publicly, leaving fans uncertain about their future. The legal battle was closely watched not only by K-pop enthusiasts but also by industry experts, as it raised questions about contract fairness and artist autonomy in the Korean entertainment industry.

Legal Battle and Contract Resolution

The legal case reached a turning point when Korean courts ruled that the members’ contracts were valid. Following the ruling, members Haerin, Hyein, and Hanni returned to ADOR. Their return was seen as a positive sign for those hoping to see NewJeans continue as a group. However, the situation took a more complicated turn when ADOR announced that they had terminated the contract of original fifth member Danielle. This news came as a shock to many fans, as Danielle had been considered an integral part of NewJeans’ sound and image.

There has also been speculation about eldest member Minji’s status. Reports suggested that Minji was in talks to return to ADOR as well, but nothing had been confirmed at press time. Despite this uncertainty, Minji appears prominently in the new “2026 Summer of NewJeans” content, leading many to believe that her return has been finalized. The inclusion of all four members in the anniversary project suggests that Minji has indeed rejoined the group, even if no official statement has been made.

The transition from a five-member group to a four-member lineup has been difficult for many fans to accept. Danielle’s departure has left a noticeable gap, and her absence is felt throughout the new content. Yet the remaining members have shown resilience and a desire to honor their shared history. The special film series is a testament to their commitment to their fans and to each other.

What This Means for NewJeans’ Future

The release of “2026 Summer of NewJeans” is a promising indicator that NewJeans is ready to resume their career. While no official news about a comeback has been revealed via ADOR or HYBE, all signs point to new music being on the horizon. The visual content is intentionally nostalgic, reminding fans of the group’s origins while building excitement for what comes next.

Industry observers note that NewJeans has always been known for their innovative approach to promotion. Their debut strategy, which involved releasing music videos without prior announcement, was unconventional and highly effective. The “2026 Summer of NewJeans” series follows a similar pattern, using visual storytelling to generate buzz without relying on traditional teaser formats.

The group’s ability to navigate legal and personal challenges and still return to the spotlight is a testament to their dedication. K-pop groups often face intense pressure, and the fact that NewJeans was able to resolve their contractual issues and reunite, even in a reduced lineup, is noteworthy. The members have consistently expressed their appreciation for their fans, and the anniversary project is clearly designed to show that gratitude.

For Bunnies, the wait has been long, but the reward appears to be worth it. The new content is filled with warmth, creativity, and a sense of unity. It serves as both a reflection on the past and a promise for the future. Whether the group will release a full album, a single, or a series of projects remains to be seen, but the momentum is clearly building.

NewJeans’ story is far from over. The group has overcome significant obstacles and is now poised to write the next chapter of their career. With the support of their label and their fans, Minji, Hanni, Haerin, and Hyein are ready to show the world what they can do as a four-member unit. The “2026 Summer of NewJeans” is just the beginning.

Source: Forbes News

The letter argues that open-weight AI models — systems whose underlying parameters are publicly available — should not face premature restrictions. Huang wrote: “Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models.” His post frames the current debate over AI regulation as a pivotal moment, akin to the early days of open-source software, when skeptics doubted that freely available code could ever power critical infrastructure.

Parallels to the 1980s open-source movement

Huang and the letter’s signatories draw a direct line between today’s fights over open-weight AI and the 1980s open-source software movement. Just as open-source code became foundational to the modern internet despite early skepticism, the letter argues, open AI models must be allowed to flourish. The software developed by the open-source community now supports most of the internet, underlies systems used by the world’s largest technology companies, and is relied upon by the U.S. military and federal agencies for critical missions such as scientific research and cybersecurity.

The letter goes further, claiming that open source did far more than lower the cost of software. It created a “shared foundation of knowledge on which generations of American engineers and entrepreneurs built their institutional sovereignty.” By drawing this historical parallel, Huang is positioning open-weight AI as the next logical step in a tradition that has already proven its value.

Three central claims of the open letter

The letter, which carries roughly 25 signers including Microsoft, Meta, Hugging Face, Andreessen Horowitz, Perplexity, and IBM, makes three central arguments in favor of open-weight AI models.

First, open models expand economic access for startups and universities. By allowing a wider range of actors to build on existing AI research, open weights lower barriers to entry and democratize access to cutting-edge technology. This, the letter contends, is essential for maintaining a vibrant innovation ecosystem in the United States.

Second, open models strengthen competition. If only a few large firms control the most advanced AI systems, the letter warns, they could dominate the market and stifle challengers. Open-weight models prevent this by enabling multiple players to develop and deploy AI solutions, ensuring that no single company or group of companies holds a monopoly on the technology.

Third, open models actually improve security. The letter argues that allowing more researchers to audit code and patch vulnerabilities is more effective than relying on a small number of closed “single points of failure.” Openness, in this view, is not a security risk but a security asset.

The letter also defends distillation — the practice of training one model using another’s outputs — as a legitimate, longstanding research technique that should not be conflated with theft. This defense comes even as distillation remains a live controversy in the AI community, with accusations of intellectual property misuse and unfair copying.

Context: Washington’s debate over Chinese open models

The post arrives as Washington debates whether to restrict Chinese open-weight models such as Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3, which was released on July 16 and ranks among the most capable models anywhere. White House adviser Michael Kratsios has accused Moonshot of using distillation to copy a U.S. model to build Kimi K3, adding tension to the distillation debate. Huang’s letter, with its explicit defense of distillation, can be read as a direct rebuttal to such accusations.

This is not the first time Huang has voiced support for Chinese AI developments. He previously said “China will win the AI race” and more recently called Chinese open models “excellent.” That positioning puts Nvidia’s CEO closer to Beijing’s framing than to the more hawkish stance of OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which are notably absent from the open-weights letter. These companies have warned Washington about the risks of strong Chinese open models, arguing that they could pose national security threats.

Xi Jinping’s rival openness message

The timing of Huang’s post is particularly significant. One week before he published his X message, Chinese President Xi Jinping made his debut appearance at the World AI Conference in Shanghai on July 17. Xi’s keynote pointedly claimed the same “openness” mantle for China. He called for “a symphony of global cooperation” rather than “a solo performance by any single country,” and urged the world to “jointly oppose overstretching the national security concept in the field of AI.” Analysts read Xi’s remarks as a direct jab at U.S. export controls.

Xi also stressed a “people-centered” approach to AI and pledged cooperation with Africa, Latin America, Asia, and BRICS nations to prevent “new historical injustices” in AI access. He backed these words with concrete offers, including 5,000 AI training slots for developing countries. This aggressive diplomatic outreach is designed to position China as the true champion of open AI, challenging the U.S. narrative.

The day before Xi’s speech, 29 countries — including Russia, Pakistan, Indonesia, Brazil, and Kazakhstan — signed an agreement in Shanghai establishing the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization (WAICO). This Shanghai-headquartered body is meant to rival U.S.-led AI governance, with UN Secretary-General António Guterres in attendance. Some analysts have questioned whether the tech world is splitting into rival blocs, with the U.S. and China each seeking to set the global rules for AI.

Huang’s message in the broader AI policy landscape

Huang’s first-ever X post is more than a symbolic gesture. It signals that Nvidia, the world’s leading AI chipmaker, is throwing its weight behind the open-weights camp. Nvidia’s business interests are deeply tied to the proliferation of AI models, as more models mean more demand for its GPUs. By advocating for open models, Huang is aligning his company with the wider AI ecosystem, including startups and academic researchers who rely on open-weight systems.

The letter’s emphasis on security and sovereignty is also carefully calibrated. Supporters of open models argue that allowing a broader community to audit code leads to faster identification of vulnerabilities. They also contend that open-weight models are crucial for countries and organizations that do not want to depend on a handful of American tech giants. This sovereignty argument resonates not just with foreign governments, but also with U.S. institutions that value self-reliance.

However, opponents of open-weight models are not convinced. They point to the risks of malicious actors fine-tuning open models for harmful purposes, including generating disinformation, designing bioweapons, or launching cyberattacks. They argue that the U.S. must impose restrictions to protect national security, even if that means limiting the open AI ecosystem. The absence of OpenAI and Anthropic from the letter underscores this divide within the American AI industry.

The debate over open-weight AI is likely to intensify in the coming months, as Washington considers new regulations and export controls. Huang’s intervention raises the stakes, bringing one of the industry’s most influential voices into the fray. His reference to the 1980s is a deliberate reminder that over-restricting technology can have unintended consequences. Just as open-source software went on to power the internet, open-weight AI could, in his view, become the foundation of the next generation of innovation.

For now, the question remains whether the United States will embrace open-weight AI as a strategic asset or view it as a liability. Jensen Huang has made his position clear, and the world is watching.

Source: MSN News

The Call in the Middle of the Night

Recalling the events on Radio Nasha, Vaswani painted a vivid picture of the desperation that gripped the Johar household in the early 1990s. Karan Johar, then a young man watching his father struggle, made a frantic call to Vaswani in the dead of night. Vaswani remembered the urgency and pain in Karan's voice as he said, “My father will die.” The statement was not a literal prediction but a reflection of the professional crisis that had engulfed Yash Johar. The once-celebrated producer, who had started Dharma Productions with the hit film 'Dostana' in 1980, had suffered an unbroken string of flops that threatened to finish his company.

The films that failed included 'Duniya' (1984), 'Muqaddar Ka Faisla' (1987), 'Gumrah' (1990), and most shockingly, 'Agneepath' (1990). The last one, starring Amitabh Bachchan and directed by Mukul Anand, was a critical and commercial disappointment despite its cult status in later years. For Yash Johar, these successive box-office disasters were crushing. The production house that had once soared with 'Dostana' was now on the verge of shutting down. Salaried employees, mounting debts, and a tarnished reputation in the film industry made the situation appear hopeless.

Mahesh Bhatt's Generous Offer with a Condition

It was during this dark period that filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt stepped in with a surprising proposal. Known for his intense and realistic cinema, Bhatt was an unlikely savior for a mainstream banner like Dharma Productions. Yet, he offered to direct a film for the production house entirely free of charge. There was, however, a single condition: Shah Rukh Khan had to play the lead. At the time, Shah Rukh Khan was still an emerging star. He had delivered notable performances in television serials like 'Fauji' and films such as 'Deewana' (1992), but his position as a box-office king was not yet firmly established. The mega-success of 'Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge' (DDLJ) was still a few years away, but his potential was unmistakable.

Bhatt's offer was both generous and strategic. He recognized the talent and charisma of Shah Rukh Khan, and he must have sensed that the young actor could bring back audiences to theaters. For Yash Johar, this offer was a lifeline. A film with a respected director like Mahesh Bhatt and a rising star like Shah Rukh Khan could potentially reverse his fortunes. But convincing Shah Rukh Khan to accept the project was no easy task.

Shah Rukh Khan's Reluctance

Vaswani, who was also the producer of 'Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa' (1994), revealed that Shah Rukh Khan was not at all keen to work with Mahesh Bhatt. The actor had a clear vision of the kind of cinema he wanted to be part of, and he felt a disconnect with Bhatt's cinematic style. As Vaswani put it, “With great respect for Bhatt sahab, he told him, 'Your kind of cinema and my kind of cinema don't match.'”

The refusal was not born out of arrogance but from a desire to stay true to his own artistic instincts. Shah Rukh Khan was at a stage in his career where he was carefully selecting roles that would define his image as a romantic hero and an action star. Bhatt's brand of gritty, emotionally intense dramas did not align with the trajectory Shah Rukh envisioned for himself. Moreover, the actor had likely heard stories of Bhatt's unconventional and sometimes abrasive working style, which could clash with his own collaborative approach on set.

Fights on the Phone

The ensuing negotiation involved a series of heated phone calls and intermediaries, which made the situation even more tense. Vaswani recounted the involvement of a man named Vasi Khan, who was Feroz Khan's associate director. Vasi Khan called Vaswani, acting as an intermediary for Bhatt's side, and aggressively demanded to speak with Shah Rukh Khan. The tone of the call was confrontational, with Vaswani being challenged on his connection to the star. But the encounter took a dramatic turn when Shah Rukh Khan himself happened to overhear the conversation.

As Vaswani remembered, “Shah Rukh accidentally heard this, and he picked up the phone, and he gave him the kind of bad words from Delhi that I had never heard.” Shah Rukh, who is known for his articulate and often passionate outbursts, was clearly angered by the dismissive tone directed at his friend and secretary. He warned Vaswani, “If this guy calls again, I will go and beat him up.” The moment illustrated Shah Rukh's fierce loyalty to those close to him, as well as his frustration with the pressure being applied to make him agree to the film.

The Emotional Appeal That Changed Everything

Despite his initial refusal, what ultimately swayed Shah Rukh Khan was not a financial incentive or a promise of creative freedom. It was the emotional appeal made on behalf of Yash Johar. Vaswani decided to confront Shah Rukh directly on the sets of his shooting at Mehboob Studios. He laid out the entire situation in plain terms: the string of flops, the financial crisis, the possibility of Dharma Productions shutting down, and how Mahesh Bhatt's offer was the one ray of hope. Vaswani explained that if Shah Rukh agreed, Bhatt would direct the film for free, giving the production house a much-needed chance to recover.

Shah Rukh Khan, known for his big heart and deep sense of loyalty, was moved by the plight of his mentor. Yash Johar was a respected figure in the industry, and Shah Rukh had a warm personal relationship with the Johar family. The actor realized that his participation could literally save the company. Despite his personal misgivings about working with Bhatt, he agreed to do the film. Thus, 'Duplicate' was born.

The Making of 'Duplicate' and Bhatt's Absence

'Duplicate', released in 1998, was a comedy-thriller directed by Mahesh Bhatt and produced by Dharma Productions. Shah Rukh Khan played a dual role: Bablu Chaudhry, a sweet-natured chef, and his lookalike Manu Dada, a ruthless underworld don. The film also starred Juhi Chawla and Sonali Bendre, adding commercial appeal to the project. Interestingly, Vaswani revealed that Bhatt was hardly present on the sets during the shooting. In his absence, it was Karan Johar and Shah Rukh Khan who effectively took charge of the film's creative and directorial decisions.

This behind-the-scenes arrangement was both practical and symbolic. Karan Johar, who would soon become one of India's most successful directors with his debut film 'Kuch Kuch Hota Hai' (also released in 1998), was at that time learning the ropes of filmmaking under the watchful eye of his father and the industry. Having Shah Rukh Khan as a collaborator on the set of 'Duplicate' provided Karan with invaluable experience and strengthened their personal and professional bond. It is widely believed that the trust and camaraderie established during this period laid the foundation for their iconic partnership in blockbusters like 'Kuch Kuch Hota Hai', 'Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham', and 'My Name Is Khan'.

'Duplicate' was not the biggest hit of Shah Rukh Khan's career, but it served its purpose. It provided Dharma Productions with a much-needed commercial success, albeit a modest one, and helped stabilize the production house. More importantly, it allowed Yash Johar to keep the company afloat until the massive success of 'Kuch Kuch Hota Hai' later that year changed everything. The latter film, directed by Karan Johar and starring Shah Rukh Khan, Rani Mukerji, and Kajol, became a cultural phenomenon and firmly established Dharma Productions as a leading force in Indian cinema.

A Brotherhood Cemented in Crisis

The story of 'Duplicate' is more than a footnote in the careers of those involved. It is a testament to the strength of relationships in an industry often characterized by volatility and self-interest. Shah Rukh Khan's decision to put aside his creative reservations and help a friend in need speaks volumes about his character. It also highlights the gratitude and admiration that Karan Johar has consistently expressed for Shah Rukh, whom he considers not just a colleague but an elder brother and family. The Johar family's ties to Shah Rukh Khan have remained unbreakable over the decades, with the actor making cameos in Karan's films and attending personal family milestones.

For Mahesh Bhatt, this episode reflects a lesser-known side of his persona. A filmmaker known for his no-holds-barred approach and his own battles with the industry, Bhatt's willingness to direct a film for free, without demanding his usual fee, demonstrated solidarity among filmmakers during tough times. Even though his role in 'Duplicate' was minimal, and he trusted the young team on the set, his initial gesture was instrumental in saving a colleague in distress.

The legacy of 'Duplicate' has endured, not because of its box-office numbers or critical acclaim, but because of the story behind its creation. It is a reminder that sometimes the most meaningful cinematic contributions are not the blockbusters but the acts of sacrifice and support that make them possible. As Shah Rukh Khan's career soared to unprecedented heights in the following years, and as Dharma Productions rose again to become a premier production house, the foundations of their success were, in no small part, laid during those turbulent days that led to the making of 'Duplicate'.

The recent recollection by Viveck Vaswani offers fans a rare glimpse into the real-life drama that unfolded away from the arc lights. It humanizes the larger-than-life figures of Bollywood and brings to the fore the emotional decisions that shape entertainment history. This untold chapter adds depth to the public narrative of Shah Rukh Khan, Karan Johar, and the late Yash Johar, ensuring that the story of how one phone call and one big-hearted star saved a cinematic legacy will not be forgotten.

Source: MSN News